Starting with this post:

https://sh.itjust.works/post/44999037

Continues here:

https://sh.itjust.works/post/45035437

More posts discussing the fallout:

Dbzer0 admin claiming Uyghur genocide is ‘overblown and misrepresented’

Dbzer0 admin casually defending Uyghur genocide denial because “libs worse”, yikes

Banned from meanwhileongrad for “No db0 allowed”.

On Dbzer0, ‘harassing mods’ is when you criticize the top admin of .ml for responding to a Wiki link with a Lemmy search

Does lemmy.ml own db0? db0 denies the Uyghur genocide, begins to backtrack that maybe there are human rights abuses, and then immediately backs off as soon as lemmy.ml admin, Davel, steps in.

Tankie bar, db0, will remove your comments and ban you if you criticise lemmy.ml admin, Davel, for denying the Uyghur genocide

When the tankie bar, db0, is pushed about communists purging peasants, Davels swoops in with dehumanisation. Also, if you bring up the Holodomor then you’re a nazi.

Removed false allegations against goat from a post on db0

An anarchist tankie did a write-up of the constant use of ‘degenerate’ as an insult specifically in the MoG comm

Another anarchist tankie did a write-up of the situation

More links: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52444570

https://sh.itjust.works/comment/329886

https://sh.itjust.works/post/151703/234360

https://sh.itjust.works/comment/338067

  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    71·
    2 months ago

    You seem mad, maybe if you re-read the source you would see that I cited one of the top Luxemburg scholars alive today, who was in turn citing the original 1919 inquiry itself.

    ‘history major’

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldEnglish
      25·
      2 months ago

      You seem mad, maybe if you re-read the source you would see that I cited one of the top Luxemburg scholars alive today, who was in turn citing the original 1919 inquiry itself.

      You seem illiterate; if you re-read the source you would see it attempts to cite Heinrich August Winkler in support of its position despite his well-known opposition to that kind of KPD apologism. If you were literate, you might also note that nowhere does the report or the article (despite its attempt at apologism) refute the idea that the Spartacist Uprising was an attempted coup along Bolshevik lines approved by and participated in by the KPD. You, on the other hand, say

      The whole “Bolshevik coup” line is just historical revisionism.

      And then attempt to cite a source that says nothing to support you - but it sounded nice and asspatting towards the KPD, so of course your illiterate ass loved it.

      ‘history major’

      Yes, I get it, you despise education. You made it clear the first time.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        71·
        2 months ago

        It literally has a passage from the report in it, that’s the citation. It references Winkler at the end but he’s not the source.

        From the actual 1919 inquiry:

        spoiler

        It is true that both independents and Communists played a leading role in the action, and also that both independents and Communists warned against it. For example, Rosa Luxemburg appears to have thoroughly disapproved of the plan […] more than 60 belonged to the USPD and little more than 10 to the KPD. […] This is not to say that they had long been planning this action specifically for 5 January, or that they were the ones on 4 and 5 January who most eagerly urged the attack.”

        The accusation you made was it was a centrally plotted KPD bolshevik coup, when the evidence from the time shows that it was not.

        Yes, I get it, you despise education. You made it clear the first time.

        You’ve got it wrong, I despise the way you behave while acting like you’re educated. Should have been clear the first time.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldEnglish
          25·
          2 months ago

          The accusation you made was it was a centrally plotted KPD bolshevik coup, when the evidence from the time shows that it was not.

          Sweetie, your illiteracy is showing again. This is the accusation I made, and I quote:

          The elections hadn’t happened yet. That’s what the Spartacist uprising was trying to prevent - upcoming elections that they were not even barred from running in.

          But tell me more about how the only response to an anti-democratic coup was to roll over and let the People’s Fascists™ execute everyone and suppress democracy.

          The KPD literally voted on the subject, lmao. Talk about ignorance - or willingly spreading lies. It’s difficult to tell with fascists.

          Yes, Luxemburg herself thought it was a bad idea and voted against it. Luxemburg voted, in fact, to participate in the upcoming elections, which is, according to red fascists like you, bourgeois. Damn that neolib Luxemburg!

          She was outvoted by the KPD leadership, which preferred a coup.

          Sorry that you’re incapable of parsing any sentence that isn’t asspatting fascism. I understand it’s a serious condition.

          You’ve got it wrong, I despise the way you behave while acting like you’re educated. Should have been clear the first time.

          The way I behave being… calling you out on spreading disinformation in service to fascist ideals?

          Wow, what a terrible way for an educated person to act. I see why a fascist bootlicker like you hates it.

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              81·
              2 months ago

              Sweetie, your illiteracy is showing again. This is the accusation I made, and I quote:

              I just love the extra sprinkling of sexism on display here. Never once in our dozens of comments has PJ called me “sweetie”

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                71·
                2 months ago

                Never once in our dozens of comments has PJ called me “sweetie”

                lmao yeah that was my cue to disengage and go to bed

              • PugJesus@lemmy.worldEnglish
                15·
                2 months ago

                I just love the extra sprinkling of sexism on display here. Never once in our dozens of comments has PJ called me “sweetie”

                Lmao. Sorry that you can’t comprehend calling someone sweetie unless they’re female? My post history is full of it. Go ahead, use the search function - ah, what am I saying? Facts are inconvenient little things, I know you despise them.

                Sorry, sweetie, that I didn’t regard you lowly enough to condescend to until you started engaging in genocide denial and simping for fascism. :)

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  61·
                  2 months ago

                  You used it this way, once, 9 months ago, against a person whose gender I didn’t bother to investigate.

                  • PugJesus@lemmy.worldEnglish
                    14·
                    2 months ago

                    You used it this way, once, 9 months ago, against a person whose gender I didn’t bother to investigate.

                    Sorry, I know that’s higher than you can count and more words than you can read.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldEnglish
              23·
              2 months ago

              does goat send you asshole DMs too?

              That’s the kind of response I would expect from someone who’s incapable of reading what I wrote.

              But no, I’ve been lucky enough to be spared that, though Goat doing so caused me to unsubscribe from MOG.

          • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            51·
            2 months ago

            Sweetie

            Ew.

            Dude. Just fucking stop. This is going way beyond into pretty disgusting territory.

            Edited to add: Your “response” is noted. Not into the casual sexism, and I find it extremely odd that you had no idea about goat. Just going to go ahead and save myself the headache now and block.