• momocchi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only issue i have with this is they have essentially taken the space shuttles off centre engine placement without a reason for them to be angled like that, this doesnt seem to have a massive fuel tank strapped to it throwing off centre of mass.

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The jet engine is below the rocket nozzle, forcing the offset. The rocket engine points towards the center of mass. How it has enough fuel for orbit without a tank, even if it is a hypersonic spaceplane, is unclear.

  • M137@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The engines pointing like that ruins the whole image IMO, it makes no sense.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It makes perfect sense, they’re pointed towards the ship’s center of mass. In atmo, the jet needs to be more or less lined up with the wings, but up near space where the air is thin, the high AOA from switching to the rockets wouldn’t be an issue–up there, what matter is whether your thrust vector lines up with COM. It’s probably not comfortable for the pilot, but it gets the job done

  • Twotone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    All this talk about the aircraft and no comments about the adorable orange robo dogo carting around munitions with the heart on its side <3

  • sebinspace@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    ITT: people who are unable to suspend disbelief to enjoy something on its own merits