![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
They’re probably into that to be honest. Weirdoes.
They’re probably into that to be honest. Weirdoes.
I have not read, but the short description tells me what it is about and that’s just enough for me.
This man evokes EnlightenedCentrismTM energy. What a joke.
Basically, the only question I have is will the dems vote against Johnson again?
Depends. If they’re doing it for giving aid to Ukraine, and keeping the government up, I’d be for keeping Johnson. Until he’s no longer useful.
Well, Hakeem Jeffries will become speaker before the November elections. Ukraine might be getting some aid, which is what I want to see.
I think militarized occupation enforcing two states solution along with a long trial of investigation to put the problematic actors behind bars is long overdue. The settlers, and groups like Hamas both needs to be addressed (in separate manners, but still a loss). And Israel should be prepared to throw the settlers under the bus as they do more harms to the state of Israel.
What’s bad news for the GOP is good news for United States of America and its allies.
First part, yes. Second part, not yet. They still want to appeal to “moderates”.
At this point in time, 2.5%(+/-).5% . Easy to figure out when it’s only 2 parties since 1968 and looking up election results.
By what evidence do you have for that? We can look at vote records and note that Duverger’s Law matches electoral records, and it is based on real world observation of elections. The other one has zero predictive power because it’s not based on anything other than guess work.
One is observed, and the other is guess work. Nice try, anyway.
Other people reading the room is precisely why I am with you in the room now. I’m not doing this to change your mind.
Let’s see. Student debt cleared to some degree. Pay raise for low wage workers. Yes, there were some.
Also, love that you ignored the issue of Duverger’s Law.
Then, explain it if that’s the case.
Did you know that I pointed out issues with your arguments? So, address them.
In context of Biden, it’s to have him on the white house to get some benefits possible, and he is the most realistic option because of Duverger’s Law. Which goes back to my point of there is no good answer as to when was the last time third party has made a huge dent electorally.
Ooh, wow, a party no one heard of, and are you talking about 1919? And this has nothing to do with vote percentage?
Color me shocked and amazed by your argument.
Yeah, if they were leftists, they vote left on downballot and vote for realistic options that is closest to left on general. That means, third parties are out unless ranked choice is a thing.
Sure, try arguing when was the last time third party has made a dent, and by what percentage. Cure my supposed historical illiteracy please.
You can go further, and assume they’re into that. Like, I wouldn’t be surprised if conservatives shower with their daughter.