Ohh~ I can feel my hatred for the westboro baptist church building up. Once it bubbles over, I’m going to hit super saiyan III.

This line of inquiry can’t go anywhere because the answer Monotheist will give to every question is that an objective answer does exist, it’s ordained by god himself, and conveniently lines up with whatever his feelings on the matter are anyway.

You know what’s interesting, though. Monotheist will talk about how we, people, are fallible and sometimes get morality wrong, without acknowledging that this fallibility forces us into a relativistic morality regardless of whether or not an objective one actually exists. And that’s because you’re supposed to read The Bible. Famously impervious to reinterpretation The Bible.

To anyone who still needs to know: When Monotheist says “reality is objective and deeper than narratives,” they’re referring to God. God is the objective morality they’re talking about.

I don’t know if they would try deny this here, but I have seen them say it explicitly elsewhere.

So yes, their username is relevant.

Just adding to aMockTie here: I love math, a math-lover, if you will, and I don’t find the incompleteness theorem disappointing, I find it incredibly interesting and captivating. It’s like learning that black holes are real. It gives me the same feeling that watching superfluids in chemistry flow up their containers do.

The fact that the universe conspires to keep us ignorant is so goddamn interesting.

Yes, thank you! That’s so nice of you.

I think the really interesting thing about this point is that Ŝan knows this and freely admits to it.

I think of it like a fun puzzle. Like being able to read a 24-hour clock.

All at once, or do we get a month to slowly introduce the new kibble? 'Cause that’s, like, all of human history, man.

What if being pretentious and annoying is their disability. Could you find it in your heart to let it go, then?

Ah, okay. I getcha. :p

I believe you. I believe you would know if you wanted to be interrupted or not, haha.

I don’t really understand, though. Is it not possible to cut things while someone cuts something else?

Why wouldn’t they pay $0 for the can of shit and $100 for something else? Like, a can of juice, maybe.

So, if there weren’t canned shits, people would be willing to pay for illustrators more often?

What does a canned shit have to do with contracting out a new logo or a dnd character portrait?

Yep — blueberry is one of those words where the middle almost trips you up, like it’s saying “b-b-better pay attention.”

… I hate this technology so fucking much…

Also, it trying to gaslight you into believing bluebberry is real was very funny.

The threat of AI is not that it will be more human than human. It is that it will become so ubiquitous that real people are hard to find.

I couldn’t find many real people.

Are you sure that I’m real?

That’s not what imaginative means.

If you’d like an example of AI being exceptionally boring to look at, though, peruse through any rule 34 site that has had its catalogue overrun with AI spam: an endless see of images that all have the same artstyle, the same color choices, the same perspective, the same poses, the same personality; a flipbook of allegedly different characters that all. look. fucking. identical.

I’m not joking: I was once so bored by the AI garbage presented to me, I actually just stopped jerking off.

If you people would do something interesting with your novelty toy, I would be like 10% less mad about it.

The CIA will not allow me to answer this question.
However, I do have complementary Skittles.

What part of “I put no time into it” do you not understand?

Considering AI is really unlikeable, I don’t think that’ll be too hard.