A federated internet is forming. It’s built on open protocols like ActivityPub & connects services like Mastodon, Threads, Pixelfed, Tumblr, Wordpress and more into a connected network known as the fediverse. And everyone from tech enthusiasts to Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey seem to want in.

  • Fluid@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    If the system can’t protect itself from being overwhelmed by the cancer of corporate interests, then it’s never going to survive. New wave internet needs to learn from the downfalls of its predecessor. The design must have protections built in to prevent capitalists from capitalising, or else it will inevitably fall.

  • Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Get fucked corporate America! Go get fucked real good. The fediverse was always what the internet was supposed to be. Not this corporate manipulation web you’ve weaved. Get fucked.

  • smallsubsidy@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    can someone here eli5 how Meta is gonna take control of the fediverse? isn’t it supposed to be a decentralized thing?

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    meh. more fud

    meta hasnt declared or made any intention of overtaking the fediverse, but that hasnt stopped a metric fuckton of people freakin the fuck out or generating fud blog post after fud blog post

    its like claiming meta is going to overtake and own email because they stood up an email server.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yes! That is most literally true!

      People doubt the face value benign intension of Meta with regard to the Fediverse.

      Which leaves uncertainty of their real intention.

      Naturally causing fear of a self interested malicious intention.

      Which all seem to be quite reasonable concerns, given Meta’s market position and history.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          As I said, I agree with the literal facts. The implications in your phrasing I disagree with.

          Instead of unfounded, I would call it unproven.
          Instead of scaremongering I would say warning.
          And generally I avoid using absolute terms like “all”, since only it takes one counter example, to make such a statement factually wrong.