• RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Ah yes, further diluting the term sex offender down to the point the label is meaningless.

    Makes perfect sense to combine teachers who accept pronouns, with people caught publicly urinating on the same list with violent rapists and convicted pedophiles… after all, it’s all the same.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    As a practical result this is more of an attack on education than an attack on LGBT, who would want to be a teacher under such tyrannical rules?

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Just give politicians prison time for wasteful laws like this. It’s objectively a waste of taxpayer’s dollars used to fuel hate crimes. Fuck them, they should get 100x the risk and accountability then the poor paycheck to paycheck teachers they keep overly focusing on.

    • Steve@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Devils advocate here, in some places, deliberately using the wrong pronouns with the intention to harm someone would be hate speech.

      So flip it around, using the preferred pronouns is considered an attack on the child and/or their shitty parents.

      • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        preferred pronouns is considered an attack on the child

        If the child doesn’t want to be called that it’s not their preferred pronoun.

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hate speech is protected by the First Amendment, so flip it around, inclusive speech is also protected by the First Amendment. I’m sure teachers can lose their jobs for hate speech but people cannot be criminally charged for hate speech alone. Prosecuting teachers as sex offenders for using pronouns is a clear and deliberate violation of their Constitutional rights.

          • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Hate crimes and hate speech are two different, but related, things, so I understand your confusion. You cannot be prosecuted for hate speech, because that is a government infringement on your liberties. They can prosecute you if the hate speech intentionally incites violence, because that is not protected speech. The hate speech can also inform intent to turn another crime into a hate crime.

          • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Legally, you cannot be criminally charged. They will not protect you from the consequences of your speech coming from private parties, whatever those are. You can increase the number or severity of charges for crimes if they are even partially motivated by prejudice towards specific groups, hate speech may be evidence of that motivation.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_in_the_United_States

          • Deello@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Calling someone the N word (hate speech) won’t get you arrested.

            Calling someone the N word while you attack them (hate crime) will.

            Under this context, yes you would be prosecuted for “hate speech” because the criminal activity here is the speech itself. Under any other circumstances you would be allowed to say whatever you like. There are always consequences to your actions, they’re just not always criminal consequences.

            • Steve@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Calling someone the nword is almost always going to make them feel unsafe, which makes it an assault, am I right?

              • urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Making someone feel unsafe is not assault. Words can compel people to act but they themselves are responsible for their actions.

                That being said, there is a concept of fighting words in the USA. Scroll down to the section titled Post-Chaplinsky, there’s information about the courts’ rulings applying to personal insults.

                Honestly I need to take time to read this wikipedia article a little more thoroughly but I’m on my way out the door. I am not a lawyer I just find law interesting.

  • elbucho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I really can’t comprehend the level of hate that these motherfuckers must possess to write or support such a bill. I mean, let’s say you’re an incredible asshole who doesn’t think that trans people exist, like you think that you know who they are much better than they actually know themselves. Even with that as a baseline, isn’t it still just the polite thing to treat them with basic respect?

    If I found out that someone I just met preferred to use their middle name instead of their first name, I would 100% use that person’s middle name when addressing them. It’s just common courtesy. The same thing goes with a person who’s transitioning - I will use their preferred name, because I’m not a completely deplorable piece of shit.

    But this guy is way worse than someone who intentionally antagonizes people by using their disliked name when addressing them. This guy wants to actively punish anybody who has the rock bottom bare minimum of civility by destroying their lives and livelihoods.

    I just can’t grasp that level of hatred. How is it that this piece of shit shares enough genes with everybody else that he’s recognized as human?

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    They complain about political correctness, and they go and do shit like this.

  • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Okay. Everyone is a they/them. No binary gender for anyone. Hedge your bets and play it right down the middle.

    Problem solved

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Two years ago I would have said no worries, there’s no way a bill like this can pass. Now? Let’s just say I don’t take anything for granted.

  • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Don’t like your teacher? Just flip your pronouns real quick and get them on the sex offender list. Problem solved.

    Fuck this bullshit

    • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What do you mean? Would a kid lie about their sex? Why mental health issues? Abuse? Clout? Trolling? What about if they are just confused? They would not become sex offenders or found guilty of anything for a honest mistake

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    study to be a teacher in Missouri
    teach full time for $30,000/year or something
    become a sex offender, obviously can’t teach anymore
    can’t actually find a job at all
    forced to live in a designated trailer park for pedophiles
    become a lifelong welfare recipient

    nice one, conservatives

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    How is anyone supposed to know anyone else’s pronouns without asking them?

    Are the teachers supposed to check the genitals of their students at the beginning of the year?