• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    So now that some of the reliable drumbeat of “5 shocking reasons Biden sucks, you won’t believe #3!” stories are starting to get removed as misinformation, we’re moving to just putting “Biden” “inflation” and “blame” into juxtaposition in the headline while still being plausible-deniable, huh

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Headlines from newspapers can be propaganda too.

        I mean, the core of what you’re saying I will admit is sorta accurate – I’m knee-jerking a response that may or may not be reasonable. A lot of it has to do with me seeing a pattern of weirdly Biden-shade-throwing stories on Lemmy, not that this one article or headline is anything wild or unreasonable.

        But I will say, on CNBC’s side, it would be easy (and more accurate) to just write a story “Here are the reasons behind inflation” without tangentially bringing up the theory that Biden’s involved, and without bringing polls of people who may or may not have a clue what they’re talking about anywhere into it.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Or even just “Businesses are the cause of inflation” if they want to skip the clickbait and get to the point.

          Could be worse, though. We could pendulum swing to the full extent of clickbait and make something like “Have beef with Biden? Wait until you hear the truth behind higher prices.”

    • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      7 months ago

      Biden still sucks. But if anyone thinks Biden is solely responsible for high prices at the grocery store and not the greedy capitalist pieces of crap corporations, they’re idiots.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s not inflation, it’s collusion. You don’t get to have record profits for four years with 20% “inflation”.

  • JDPoZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    …And he won’t do a goddamn thing about it legislation-wise. Hell, he won’t even SAY anything about it.

    I really wish we would have elected the guy who - despite what he could or couldn’t have done in office - at least used the bully pulpit to call out the ghouls with dragon-like hoards of wealth that have put us all in a worse place than our parents were 60 years ago.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I’d settle for where my parents were 30 years ago. One middling income, no higher education, and a 2500 square foot house purchased for $350k dollars (in today dollars adjusted for inflation) that’s ‘worth’ $750k now.

      Adjusting for inflation, my wife and I combined make as much as my dad did.