rnercle@sh.itjust.works to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomull = problematic Firefox installation?sh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up161arrow-down116file-text
arrow-up145arrow-down1external-linkmull = problematic Firefox installation?sh.itjust.worksrnercle@sh.itjust.works to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square23linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down25·2 years agoThey sold their soul. I don’t trust them farther than I can throw a fully loaded 787. On that same note, fuck Google, fuck Apple, fuck Adobe, fuck LG, I can go on forever. Now keep down voting me, fuck those who do too. 🤣
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·2 years agoThey did? That’s news to me. Who did they sell it to? And what do you use instead? So help me God, if you say Brave
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoTo the devil (Google). No, I respect myself and you too much to say Brave. Mullvad and Libres Wolf. So, the fox while unfucked without a tail.
minus-squareefstajas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoMozilla “sold their soul to Google”? What did I miss?
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 years agohttps://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/a-dangerous-conflict-of-interest-between-firefox-and-google/ Look at the finances part: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation That’s hooker behavior right there.
minus-squaretheshatterstone54@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoI agree with pretty much everything after “on that same note”, except I’m not familiar with LG. What did they do?
minus-squarecrusty@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoProblematic linear compressors maybe?
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoProbably the privacy invasive TVs
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoPrivacy invasive everything, forced arbitration, TOS bait and switch.,etc.
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoOh, was it them that made the IoT washing machines with a nasty habit of unannounced port scans?
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoAs far as I know, Samsung and LG both do that. But I’m guessing every manufacturer that adds wifi connectivity does the same.
They sold their soul. I don’t trust them farther than I can throw a fully loaded 787. On that same note, fuck Google, fuck Apple, fuck Adobe, fuck LG, I can go on forever.
Now keep down voting me, fuck those who do too. 🤣
They did? That’s news to me. Who did they sell it to? And what do you use instead?
So help me God, if you say Brave
To the devil (Google).
No, I respect myself and you too much to say Brave. Mullvad and Libres Wolf. So, the fox while unfucked without a tail.
Mozilla “sold their soul to Google”? What did I miss?
https://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/a-dangerous-conflict-of-interest-between-firefox-and-google/
Look at the finances part: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation
That’s hooker behavior right there.
I agree with pretty much everything after “on that same note”, except I’m not familiar with LG. What did they do?
Problematic linear compressors maybe?
Probably the privacy invasive TVs
Privacy invasive everything, forced arbitration, TOS bait and switch.,etc.
Oh, was it them that made the IoT washing machines with a nasty habit of unannounced port scans?
As far as I know, Samsung and LG both do that. But I’m guessing every manufacturer that adds wifi connectivity does the same.