• interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This was the case before countries existed. The territories used to be limited to how far the human cattle could walk, be productive and walk back home in day.

    Freedom is only possible where the possibility of encountering other humans is negligible.

    Whenever humans aglomerate, non productive humans require handouts to live. If they do not receive then they die. If they don’t want to die, they will steal. If the other humans resist, there will be a struggle and whoever wins becomes the state.

    I think keeping population below 1 per square kilometer and spread out is the best solution to the state predation problem.

    • bermuda@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      1 per square kilometer is physically impossible unless you plan on finding a way to kill 7.9 billion people.

      Earth has 146 million square kilometers of land.

      It’s a neat idea but I think “the largest genocide in the history of humanity” kinda outweighs your solution.

    • nik282000@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whenever humans aglomerate, non productive humans require handouts to live. If they do not receive then they die. If they don’t want to die, they will steal.

      Yeah, we know, politicians.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You got it, the mediators between us and them. See Europe and their history with romas people, for what it looks like when this peace breaks down.