• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The PRC is absolutely a viable alternative, it’s a Socialist Market Economy that has been steadily transfering Private Property into Public Property as markets coalesce into monopolist syndicates, which are then capable of central planning.

    • hostops@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They have the most wild form of capitalism there is. And they married it with a lot of corruption and zero political freedom. This is not an alternative. Please.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        They have a Socialist Market Economy, and married it to a Dictatorship of the Proletariat following whole-process people’s democracy. One of the focuses of Xi’s presidency has been anti-corruption, along with steady socialization of the private sector. Read Socialism Developed China, Not Capitalism. You have an ultra-idealist vision of Socialism that is anti-Marxist. Private property is socialized by degree, not decree!

        • hostops@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yes I have seen you in other comments. And we both know what is the actual state and level of freedom, poverty, and capitalism and corruption in China. Maybe organize a protest in China.

          I know you like their system, but for some reason you fail to see issues with their system.

      • Abnorc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Agreed. You can’t argue with how effective it’s been for the country as a whole, but I don’t think i’d rather live there as an individual.