RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.worksdeleted by creator to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoGoogle must crack open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judgewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up183arrow-down13
arrow-up180arrow-down1external-linkGoogle must crack open Android for third-party stores, rules Epic judgewww.theverge.comRmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.worksdeleted by creator to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square26linkfedilink
minus-squarecatsup@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down12·2 years agorofl at this title trying to victimize google for being monopolistic assholes
minus-squareSestren@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·2 years agoHow does the title victimize Google?.. It literally just summarizes the article, and then in the first sentence of the actual article they flat out call Google an illegal monopoly.
minus-squarecatsup@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down3·2 years ago“Must crack open” crack open has negative connotations. “Must allow” is a much more neutral way to phrase it. “Epic Judge” The judge isn’t epic’s, it’s just the judge that happens to be dealing with this case.
minus-squarevrek@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoOk, they got me on the second one… I was seriously wondering how epic had their own judge and it wasn’t conflict of interest.
minus-square佐藤カズマ@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoWelcome to America, where the judges might as well wear racing suits full of sponsors. Actually, that might be an improvement on the status quo.
minus-squareNight Monkey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·2 years agoLots of Google cock Gobbler’s around here it seems
rofl at this title trying to victimize google for being monopolistic assholes
How does the title victimize Google?.. It literally just summarizes the article, and then in the first sentence of the actual article they flat out call Google an illegal monopoly.
“Must crack open”
crack open has negative connotations. “Must allow” is a much more neutral way to phrase it.
“Epic Judge”
The judge isn’t epic’s, it’s just the judge that happens to be dealing with this case.
Judge:
Dudes: Whoa… epic!
Ok, they got me on the second one… I was seriously wondering how epic had their own judge and it wasn’t conflict of interest.
Welcome to America, where the judges might as well wear racing suits full of sponsors. Actually, that might be an improvement on the status quo.
Lots of Google cock Gobbler’s around here it seems