• TauZero@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    The yyyy-mm-dd format (ISO 8601) is the only one that is unambiguous, because no one so far in history has ever used the yyyy-dd-mm format (at least until some xkcd-reading jokester probably will start using it just out of spite). I use ISO 8601 everywhere. It has the additional benefit that filenames get sorted correctly in lexographical order.

    • Waker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone that works with huge amounts of data with dates in varied formats… PLEASE let this be standardised. :')

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was expecting a KFC situation, but no:

          Because ‘International Organization for Standardization’ would have different acronyms in different languages (IOS in English, OIN in French), our founders decided to give it the short form ISO. ISO is derived from the Greek word isos (ίσος, meaning “equal”). Whatever the country, whatever the language, the short form of our name is always ISO.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many years ago, I came across a forum that formatted dates yyyy-dd-mm. That was such a traumatic memory that I still remember it.