13zero@kbin.socialtoTechnology@beehaw.org•Red Hat strikes a crushing blow against RHEL downstreams | The Register
1·
1 year agoGot it.
I don’t see how that could comply with the terms of the GPL.
Got it.
I don’t see how that could comply with the terms of the GPL.
What stops one person with a free account from mirroring the source?
It’s also against the spirit of the GPL if not the letter. Red Hat isn’t just required to release source code to its customers upon request; that source code comes with GPL rights and restrictions attached (including the right to distribute).
Is it legal for Red Hat to require customers to waive their GPL rights? I don’t think it should be, but I don’t think courts are particularly friendly to copyleft holders.
Some of the changes in GPLv3 seem to address this type of behavior. There might be some narrow gaps that Red Hat is taking advantage of, but the folks at GNU at least made things harder.