Ah, I didn’t catch that. I would like to think they’d only add things with a good purpose, e.g. better early game experience.
Mo-Fr 07:00-16:00 Sa, So geschlossen
Ah, I didn’t catch that. I would like to think they’d only add things with a good purpose, e.g. better early game experience.
The golden ball thingy in the bottle village? That’s this floating “cage pyramid” where you can go up with a swing like elevator. I’m lacking the words to describe it better.
It seem I forgot most of Ghens world tho.
If that was in the original game (which I did play it a couple of times) I absolutely don’t remember it.
You’re right of course about the limits of the point and click and forced view nature of the game. A lot is hidden / cannot be explored as thoroughly.
It looks pretty right to me. I’ll probably pick it up (after already having the original and the steam version).
There seem to be some changes / additions to the original game? For example I don’t remember the house/dome thing on the giant tree stump (~30s) or the tree (at the end of the trailer).
Double edged sword, but yeah.
Acquisitions don’t need to pay for themselves. Ideally they do, but sometimes it’s enough if they just help the company’s main business stay in business, or grow.
IBM is making $30bn+ in gross profit each year.
It would be possible to argue about all of them, as each has genuine use cases. Just not to the extend they were praised during the hype.
2 was too fast, no question. But 1 clearly was too slow. There’s no reason not to play it as fast as humanly possible.
Can anyone give an opinion on whether to get “Escape the Dark Castle” or “Escape the Dark Sector”?
Most likely the mic is simply powered by the voltage which also powers the headphones.
But there’s also mics which don’t need voltage to work at all (unlikely for headsets tho).
You don’t know anything about me or my work experience.
Throwing around insults is not helpful, but neither is “trust me bro”.
Just like the OG Pirate Bay. They closed down, and someone else, unknown, took over.
That’s not unproblematic ofc as the new owner can do whatever they want without the oversight of the non-profit.
Good initiative, but it feels a like the precursor to becoming a legit business.
Not that I ever reused the potato cooking water, but TIL. Thank you.
That show should come with the disclaimer to avoid the season finale at all costs. Just terrible.
Dictatorships (or any otherwise ideology driven entities) will have their very own problems training AI. Cannot feed the AI material which goes against your own ideology or it might not act in your best interest.
I like the idea (I don’t want to call it a fan theory) that it resembles a typical “first love” relationship. Whose first relationship / young love was not cringe and full of awkward situations (for bystanders)?
Never thought of this, you’re not wrong.
On the other side her dying because she lost the will to life… is kind of a good explanation for an unlikely death in such an advanced civilization.
Obviously they could simply keep her alive despite any actual medical condition. So what else could she die of… except for a spiritual (I don’t know a better description) reason.
Kind of a “so bad it’s actually good” explanation.
Well I don’t know why it’s being done like this, but my informed guess would be:
Resilience. If the content wouldn’t be copied, defederating/blocking an instance would mean that the content you created there (topics, comments, etc) would be lost to you. So if you wrote a nice comment, or saved a bunch of topics for later, and then your instance blocks the other instance… that would be gone for you. With the copy this doesn’t happen.
Performance. Instead of having to deal with every user (from a different instance) individually, your instance only has to deal with other instances. With this updates between each other can be sent in larger chunks (and definitely with less network connections). Additional benefit: smaller instances don’t get knocked down by user-heavy instances when they host a popular community.
Just guesses tho.
All social media is a liability time bomb unfortunately. That’s why only the biggest players can afford it so far.
No there isn’t. Companies are incentivised to extract as much money as possible from any given buyer. There is never a “this is enough money, I won’t charge you more” situation. Inevitably every buyer will become a non-buyer, because they were outpriced.
Competition should solve this issue, but it doesn’t work in media because there’s no two rights holders for star wars content, or marvel content, or whatever. So services cannot compete on the same content, because the rights holders simply won’t let them.
Copyright is a pest.