Think of the poor shareholders!
Think of the poor shareholders!
Technically, isn’t this a different thing? Genuinely asking.
There could be a license that forbids use (sort of like the CC no commercial use license) but still allows the code to be reviewed publicly, no?
Because they didn’t come out saying they won’t enable ads. They just quietly renamed the toggle to say something else, and that is shady AF. Why are you trying to spin it positively?
I’m convinced Trump’s mind doesn’t work like that, and that his memories are heavily slanted by how he perceived his role in the event. Others’ roles or the factual details are arranged automatically by his brain to fill this role he sees himself playing.
No one surely ever challenged him on his constant nonsense, so he’s had a lifetime of reinforcement over this behaviour.
As he’s aging however the detachment between his perception and recollection of an event is growing much larger, and the result is these wild made-up tales…
Ehehehehhehehhe!!! Thanks for the entertainment!
By now it’s clear that it’s your reading comprehension that is lacking, you aren’t fully understanding the responses you’re getting. Perhaps you’re not a native speaker…
You’re a special kind of person, aren’t you?
This far down, and you keep demanding that someone answers you about why “they” are liberals, behaving as if the universe owes you answers.
Sympathetic with your deluded but apparently honest ignorance, @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world did their best by sharing an anecdote that demonstrates that, while possible that “they” are liberals because the issues directly impacting “them”, that may not necessarily be the case.
Alas, it was then that we came to find that you just wanted to hear yourself talk while petulantly dismissing others’ thoughts.
The story developed unexpectedly however, as this behaviour was accurately and immediately pointed out, and this led to a series of increasingly irate comments, likely caused by a mounting sense of frustration stemming from the inability to rebuff such accurate criticism. We’re sure to see an escalation from the passive aggression initially being employed into more open and direct insults, as a welling sense of dread about being outwitted threatens to set in.
Stay tuned!
Brother, this law is just deranged. Trapping people in a marriage is not OK.
Divorce includes agreements over custody, why not consider an expected child into that as well?
This is true, specs between different versions are different.
That said, it’s definitely NOT a reason to buy expensive. I can find 1.3 HDMI cables being sold right now at over twice the price of a legit 2.1 cable…
I played it as part of Xbox live, paid $20 for 2 months. Ended up playing a lot more of Senua Sacrifice than I did Starfield.
That price is very acceptable, almost a convenience fee that I gladly pay so I don’t have to look for torrents and stuff.
I would never pay the hyperinflated prices that are being asked for AAA nowadays, especially for digital copies that, as PlayStation is keen to teach us, are worthless.
Came looking for this.
Get rid of Gabe and put in the Unity board, and we’ll be paying extra for every Mb we download…
Oh man these are so fun to read!
I’ve never played paper and pen DND, any suggestions of YouTube or podcast of people playing in goofy/weird ways, but within the rules?
Oooh, really nice answer. Thank you!
Sorry what do you mean with your last sentence, “create a scenario in which the rule would be correct and give a hint”?
Never played pen and paper, this question fascinates me.
Torvalds rejected the merge, and that’s pretty much what he said - no one is using bcachefs.
There’s no reason for a “fix” to be 1k+ lines, these sorts of changes need to come earlier in the release cycle.