I understand his thought process: “i voted nine times and they still won, either I suck very hard or they voted more times than me” Sorry mate, reality is hard
I understand his thought process: “i voted nine times and they still won, either I suck very hard or they voted more times than me” Sorry mate, reality is hard
There is nothing as bad as trump voters
That’s a big mistake. Dekocrats don’t lack balls to do what the republicans do, the just have a little bit of morals that the republicans completely lack.
If you are interested you can go and find one, it’s not going to be difficult. We are not here to bring you stuff. What a level of entitlement, sir (or ma’am).
Yeah it would be doubly damning for them if they had the evidence but were unwilling to proceed
Yes, without further context to me it sounds like it’s saying that supreme court betrayed democracy by disqualifying trump
The title makes it sound like the judge was in favour of trump, while it’s the opposite
Polls would be ok if the sample was peefectly random. However it is never fully random, and in practice they always overrepresent politically active people and underrepresent the poor.
What are you talking about? Polls are not valid statistics, they are riddled with biases that can’t be eliminated.
Sure, keep living in your own world while your friend Trump is processed and sentenced for for every possible crime.
How can YOU not be angry with a proved liar, rapist and traitor politician.
I guess next news