

I feel like this is a reference to something…


I feel like this is a reference to something…
I said i compress with AES-256
To avoid confusion you could say, “along with”, or fully say, “I encrypt with AES-256 as I compress, in one step”.
It’s not necessarily about what you know, but about what readers will understand. (For example, someone who doesn’t know better might read what you wrote and think there is some way to compress using AES-256 and go down a rabbit hole.)


Archive link: https://archive.is/KFUuV


This is the one I was looking for!


It looks like a translucent black rectangular overlay that happens to line up with the chest to me.
Why they have it I’m not sure…


Looks like that will be a tough one to find. Have you tried putting up a request on any private trackers?


Yeah, those were my original thoughts. I think it would take some experimentation to see what works.


A-10 Tank Killer was the bomb.


I wonder if 3d printed driver tips would be better for matching the material strength and reduce stripping. Or maybe they wouldn’t have enough strength at all and would just twist and fall apart.
I was also wondering how well printing drywall anchors would work.


Watch your cornhole, bud.


I really enjoyed Grounded. Never got to the end game, but probably because I didn’t really try. I just had a lot of fun exploring and fighting bugs.
Then bringing it to a blue mailbox might be your best option.
Can you leave sticking out of the slot?
That’s the point of the post-it note. So they see it.
I’ve done it before at an apartment, though admittedly it was many many moons ago.
The sticky note was just to be a flag, not the message.
If you don’t want to take it to a mailbox, you can put it back in your own mailbox with the “return to sender - no longer at this address” on it. The mail carrier can pick it up when they deliver your mail next. If they seem to miss it, you can try putting a bright post-it note on it to make it stand out.


The REPO devs are quoted as saying:
And while on this topic, we want to encourage all mod makers to please optimize the amount of server traffic they send to avoid any skyrocketing server costs.
But the article writer turns this into:
The devs are most likely referring to mods that increase REPO’s player count above its 6-player default max. Last year, Content Warning faced similar issues, to the point that the devs had to shut down mods that increased the lobby size.
If that was what they meant, that’s what they would have said, since what they said doesn’t imply that at all. Depending on the API, the mods could be doing any number of things with even a single player that would send network traffic through the roof.
Telling modders this is just about lobby size might diminish the impact of what the devs are requesting. An inexperienced modder who isn’t changing lobby size might not realize they’re inadvertently being a bad citizen with other stuff they’re doing.
As someone else mentioned, they should look into protecting themselves within their API though. Rate limits, etc. Since this whole thing took off on them unexpectedly, they probably weren’t prepared, so in the meantime they’re requesting the mods be more careful. Ultimately, this won’t work though.
Tbh, if it was just a lobby size thing, I would think that would be super easy to defend against server-side…
Not loving the micro-transaction MMO, but it was always destined to go that way…