Yes, and I guess don’t play it then…

Autocorrect, but you get the meaning

They did. Fallout 76 was licensed to a newly created studio named Bethesda Austin. And Fallout 76 was an on holy disaster on release.

It clearly isn’t!

A) Man has dreamt of Artificial Intelligence for decades now, often times very much realizing the capabilities (and dangers) of such technology B) AI in its current form already support business, hobbies, creative work etc. The traffic and processing power needed is constantly rising.

I feel with a such a bold (and just incorrect) statement the article cannot be much worth to read.

Can really recommend Jacket.

https://github.com/Jackett/Jackett

Lemmy devs being man children when confronted with GDPR compliance.

And if Lemmy if supposed to better Reddit in basic fucking decency then GDPR is absolutely crucial.

I think this is more likely some bizarre attempt at making the AI anti-racist.

The man was hallucinating and activating random emergency switches in the cockpit…

Clearly not the case in this instance

Questioning the moral of pilots tripping on psychedelics?

Oh yeah no it was safe no doubt, no doubt. I would like all my pilots to do shrooms.

Safe!

I’ve tried to use Thieves tools once and it went like this:

Tried it on a flimsy door, people were looking so I put the tools away. I instead picked up a barrel and threw it at the door at which point i teleport in, met a chick with paralyzed legs and then teleport out. Door was fine though and the thieves tools had done its job.

I can’t tell if the game is jank and I’m much too creative or if the game is masterclass and I just can’t comprehend its genius.

Yes, when the security patches stops it’s time to switch. But since these are usually a separate deploy chain from regular Android updates its hard to figure out when these patches stops coming. I’ve tried to find out out when the security patches for my Samsung S20+ stops, no idea still.

Who are you guys if you don’t mind me asking. What’s your background?

Thats confusing but ok… so saved the state, only I cannot verify it since when i open the settings again it resets my choices. Not exactly great since the end user cannot verify their settings. Fine though, as long as it works.

I click ‘do not consent’, leave the dialogue page and open it up again and see that the consent for ‘Legitimate interest’ is ticked in, I.e not the way I left it. My worry, obviously, is that it doesn’t save the state with the choises I’ve made.

This is the state after I’ve selected ‘do not consent’:

Cool, bumpy start but I support your work, you will be instrumental in growing Lemmy. GDPR issues needs to be fixed pronto as it otherwise won’t legally comply in the EU.

I’ve got a bug fix thread here

Keep it up!

‘Legitimate interest’ consent for ad-tracking, as the settings state is not compliant with GDPR. ‘Legitimate interest’ consent bare bones and for security and other essential functions only, not ads.

For me, the dialogue changed and I think the prompt is some html redirect. Gives me the option to deny all (but it currently does not work)

The bug has been fixed