it’s a bunch of loose files, basically. If you wanted it actively hosted, you’d just need to put them into a web server, basically.
it’s a bunch of loose files, basically. If you wanted it actively hosted, you’d just need to put them into a web server, basically.
Or Trump up some wild charges about tax fraud or something
So we want Google and such to ignore laws when we think they should be ignored? Who decides which is which then?
I don’t get the premise of posts like that. We scold Google and other corps for not following the laws they are supposed to follow (data protection for example).and then we scold them for daring to follow lawmakers, when we don’t like the laws they follow. Which is it?
How can this be damaging if you ain’t trying to sell it to us in the first place?
Perhaps what they developed is a bunch of Windows 2005 Servers stacked on top of each other
Perhaps their “stack” only ever uses caddy
Can we all agree to call this vulnerability “Poobear”?
But are you using Arch tho?
Let me break down the explanations given, because most of them boil down to this:
As a noun, yes, because it’s mainly used in biology like that (“A hawk female”) and thus can come off as dehumanizing. As an adjective: No (“A female cashier”, “A male cashier”)
6w or so in idle, 50w under load with HDDs and RPi combined
Just to be sure here: we all know that batmetal is just a YouTube skid format based on songs by the Band Dethklok, yes?
There are no fingerprints deep under water
Nothing to tie one to a crime
And if you seek vengeance
All you need are instruments of pain
Where do you store those files? I’m not familiar with the abbreviation msd
As many others have said, only resaving the image with another jpg compression will degrade quality. What are you using to view the images with? Also, your workflow for looking at.those images/encrypting them sounds rather convoluted. May I ask why you do it that way? Is encryption important to you or is it something else? The constant zipping and unzipping sounds unsafe (so much copying, archives can corrupt) and insanely time-consuming.
Just renaming them to PNG will change nothing at best and make your viewer unable to open the images at worst.
Yeah, no. Just no. Absolutely no. Faster than everything else.and higher than everything else and all of that by burning less energy? Come on people, stop falling for this kind of crap.
Guestbook anyone?
Another one of those “solution in search of a problem” things. It really doesn’t solve any of the drawbacks of HTML/CSS, it just does the same thing in a different (way less supported) way.
Thing is that I got the HDDs lying around already. The hub supplies 5v/3A so powershould not be an issue… Yet who knows… I could try to power the HDDs from a USB power supply with a split cable and see if that helps
Yeah, I think you’re looking for Monica at this point.