Last time (about a year ago) I looked into Misskey it was lacking some really basic features that even Misskey users were warning me about. Don’t remember what they were, but I think lacking hashtags was one of them? What’s the usability state of Misskey today?

Instead, when a user posts something, the algorithm automatically reads the content and tags it with relevant interests so it shows up on those pages.

Motherfucker this is what hashtags are for.

Of course, I do things because they’re fun to do. But those things don’t require any effort. When people talk about motivating yourself it’s usually about using the motivation as a tool to do things that take a lot of effort.

Someone not too long ago asked me how I motivate myself, and I was quite puzzled by the question, like “what do you mean motivate myself? That’s not how motivation works?”, because to me motivation has always come from external sources, like people, situations, experiences etc. But no, apparently some (many? most?) people can somehow motivate themselves. I’d like to have that power please.

Nothing. As in procrastinate by doing basically nothing.

Yeah I had no idea. Now I have one and I’m immediately considering moving to a different fedi microblog platform. I’ve already lost quite a bit of trust for Rochko due to his extreme eagerness to federate with Meta.

I use it a little bit. I think it’s pretty good but I don’t come from Instagram or anything like that, so I had no expectations. And I only use it very sparsely. I’m guessing that if you’re a heavy browser you might run out of content. But for me personally such platforms are more for posting photos than endless browsing.

I’m not the biggest fan of the UI of the official app, but it’s not bad bad.

I prefer:

Fediverse > Fedichorus > Fedibridge > Fedichorus

It’s been quite a while since I read about the inefficiency. I think it had something to do with CPU load, and that it’s unnecessarily “chatty” in some ways that causes servers to use unnecessarily large amounts of data. And the extensions had to do with different types of services, where the AP spec is best suited for one type of service (like maybe micro-blogs iirc), and others have to use the spec in weird ways or add things on top of it to implement other features that are important for those other types of services, like more forum-esque type things like Lemmy. Don’t remember exactly what they were, but one thing I read last week was that guy who had to shut his AP project down because he used a method of fetching data, that Mastodon (or whichever service it was) uses but isn’t part of the AP spec, and poorly documented, so he implemented it wrong which had horrendous consequences for him, but that’s a different story.

Well, there are many different aspects to take into account. I was thinking more of how inefficient AP is when it comes to system resources and network usage, and some other things I can’t remember that made me go “yikes” when I read it. Also how it’s used for things the protocol doesn’t really have support for, so devs make their own solutions that are now part of the AP Fediverse even though the protocol itself, that is the backbone of the thing in question, doesn’t support the things that is a part of the thing. It seems a big mess in many ways, and I believe that Bluesky doesn’t have those issues.

I never said there was. I’d prefer it if they made AP better instead. And there’s a lot of room for improvement.

Yup. PBC is just a slightly different flavor of a standard corporation. Bluesky have investors, they’re burning investor money right now, they don’t know how to monetize the platform yet, and when those investors come knocking for their ROI it’s the same ol enshittification process all over again. No thanks. I don’t care if the backend is FOSS as long as it all revolves around a corporation, especially one with the roots of Bluesky. If there grows a viable and open community and ecosystem out of that, completely self-sustaining without the need for the corporation, using the FOSS code (or perhaps preferably a fork of it), then that’s a different story and that could be interesting.

I don’t know much about their protocol, but I find it likely to be better than ActivityPub since AP is kind of a mess. However I’m not going back to corporate social media ever again. The fewer corporate things in my life the better.

Everything is politics. But people tend to not like to think of things as politics. Because “politics is boring”.

Vote Republican at your own peril.

Peril is less bad than those communist democrats, I bet all too many morons believe.

Never even heard of the concept before and it sounds extremely weird. And yet I’m intrigued.

Defederation is an absolutely necessary tool. There are instances out there you don’t want any part of, with CSAM etc. But with that said I think defederation should mostly be used for such things. Block lists (containing instances, users, hashtags) that users can subscribe to would be a better way to handle the rest, and instances could recommend and/or curate lists for their users and maybe activate them by default.

Instances defederating from another instance because that second instance hasn’t defederated from a third instance is a good way to ruin the future of the Fediverse I think. It’s just an immature and destructive behavior leading to fragmentation.

What does “vaguely European” even mean?

I don’t know. I used to pirate like crazy. It was ridiculously easy. I wouldn’t even know where to begin today when it’s more important to protect yourself than it was back then. As far as I know at least, due to new laws etc.

Yeah the data is an issue for sure. I wonder if torrents of some kind would help making it more doable, where viewers (on computers, not phones) build up a cache from which they also seed. Like Spotify did when they started out.