• 1 Post
  • 92 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle












  • People picked Biden because around a million people died during Trump’s botched Covid response

    More people voted for Donald Trump in 2020 than in 2016. Biden flipped swing states that Hillary lost because of her shit reputation on labor issues. But then Biden took office and broke a railroad strike, undermined the UAW during their auto worker’s strike, and failed to pass the PRO Act with a Dem majority. He’s significantly less popular in these Midwestern states than he was four years ago.

    People are now picking Trump because their news media has told them outlandish lies about Biden

    What? That he’s old? That appears to be the entire media critique of his candidacy.

    They support his Israel policy. They want to see him funnel another $100B in military spending to Ukraine. They love how he’s bent over backwards to curb inflation, just as wages were beginning to rise. But since climate change and war are a bummer to read about after three nightmarish years, we’re getting a slew of stories that amount to “Yo, did you notice how old this old guy is?!”

    Sometimes, simple innate “anger” at the incumbent leads people to vote against him, but I think in this specific election that’s a very small part of it.

    Sometimes media moguls just want another big Republican tax cut. Sometimes the conservatives smell blood in the water with abortion, environmental regs, LGBT rights, and labor rights all up for grabs. Sometimes the guy who gave Strom Thurmond’s eulogy just isn’t able to stay in touch with the youth vote.

    Biden’s got a lot working against him. The singular point in his favor is “Trump Will Destroy America!!!” And when the major American exports appear to be carbon emissions and bombs targeted at brown people, its getting harder and harder to convince people that this would be a bad thing.


  • With a proportional representation system the parties hold all of the power

    In a multi-party system, that’s fine. Parties accrue delegates by appealing to a voting base. And candidates get onto the slate by working in and for the parties to bring in new supporters and achieve policy changes.

    If the party you voted for isn’t part of the ruling coalition then your vote didn’t matter.

    That depends on the parliamentary rules and constitutional provisions. But - generally speaking - if you’ve got a delegate you support in the parliament you’re much better off than if you’re casting a protest vote for an individual or group who will never hold a seat. Even if its a lone Ron Paul / Bernie Sanders esque voice, that’s a foundation around which to build a movement. By contrast, a Ralph Nader outsider who gets seen as a spoiler candidate every four years is going to build more hostility to your movement the more successful it gets.

    That individual representative can leave the party and will still hold the seat.

    Love my Jim Justice style politician

    Why would I want a candidate that can win under a party banner that I support and then turn coat the moment they’re ensconced in a four or six year term of office?

    And those representatives have to keep their communities happy.

    Not if they’re doing the one-term Senate gambit, like Kristen Sinema. Six years cultivating favors with corporate interests, and then resign before you party can primary you out so you can take a job as a lobbyist.

    You get to vote for a party that completely conforms to a checklist, but that party may have zero impact on real policy.

    Coalition governments build support by appealing to particular interests of the various party members. That means an “Abolish the National Debt” Party and a “Green New Deal Party” are going to form a different kind of government than a “Green New Deal” and a “Small Business Alliance” party. But if you’re interested in debt-politics and I’m interested in clean energy and third guy is interested in business start-up subsidies, we’re all better off supporting for our issue-centric partisan groups than aligning behind a “Generic Liberal” or “Generic Conservative”.







  • We need to be rioting in the streets to change first past the post.

    Trump’s going to win more than 50% of the vote in my state of Texas. Complaining about FPTP is so 1996 “Ross Perot Could Have Won” energy. In states and districts so heavily weighted that one party will take 60%+ it simply doesn’t matter.

    That said, it might be nice if we had real proportional representation - party ballots and larger congressional delegations - such that voting for a Green or Libertarian or Reform party ballot means you might actually be sending someone who shares your views to the assembly, rather than just signaling dissatisfaction with the dominant parties.

    Even the California Jungle Primary system would be preferable.