Chest freezers are exceptionally energy efficient. It’s not a very good comparison.
Chest freezers are exceptionally energy efficient. It’s not a very good comparison.
Light + TIF https://sky.rethinkdns.com/1:AAkACAQA
Normal + TIF https://sky.rethinkdns.com/1:AAkACAgA
Pro + TIF https://sky.rethinkdns.com/1:AAoACBAA
Pro plus + TIF https://sky.rethinkdns.com/1:AAoACAgA
Ultimate + TIF https://sky.rethinkdns.com/1:gAgACABA
Light + TIF https://dns.dnswarden.com/00000000000000000000048
Normal + TIF https://dns.dnswarden.com/00000000000000000000028
Pro + TIF https://dns.dnswarden.com/00000000000000000000018
Pro plus + TIF https://dns.dnswarden.com/0000000000000000000000o
Ultimate + TIF https://dns.dnswarden.com/0000000000000000000000804
Light https://freedns.controld.com/x-hagezi-light
Normal https://freedns.controld.com/x-hagezi-normal
Pro https://freedns.controld.com/x-hagezi-pro
Pro plus https://freedns.controld.com/x-hagezi-proplus
Ultimate https://freedns.controld.com/x-hagezi-ultimate
TIF https://freedns.controld.com/x-hagezi-tif
Rethink DNS, DNS Warden, and ControlD with Hagezi blocklists via DoH/3. I highly recommend the ‘+ TIF’ as they are threat intelligence feeds which are up to date lists of bad actors/malware.
You’re completely missing what he’s saying, and how that number is calculated. It’s an average connection speed over time and you’re anecdotally saying your internet is superior because you have a higher connection speed, which isn’t really true at all.
You have residential internet which is able to provide 3Gbps intermittently. You may even be able to sustain those speeds for several days at a time. But servers maintain those connections for months and years at a time…
800TB/mo is 2.469 Gb/s sustained for 30 days. They may be on a 10Gb/s connection, but that doesn’t mean they have enough demand to saturate it 100% of the time.
Debian, baby.