The problem is that “don’t let people game you” is extremely difficult.
It’s many, many orders of magnitude easier to provide a useful search of sites that tell you the truth about what they are than it is when 99% of sites lie to you.
But still declared them liable for the actions of their users.
Bad ruling, just less bad than it could be.
If I put the over/under at 10x male pirate to female, are you taking the under?
I’ve definitely noticed the results suck ass, but this is a nice breakdown.
That shouldn’t work. They should still be unconditionally liable for anything the rep said in all scenarios, with the sole exception being obvious sabotage like “we’ll give you a billion dollars to sign up” that the customer knows can’t be real.
“AR” has always been sci-fi. The details you’re discussing have never been part of the discussion because it was fiction.
This is far more AR than any of the shitty displays that project on glasses (all of which also are distorting and changing the light from the real world) and don’t have meaningful capacity to interact with the real world inputs. Any reasonable definition of AR absolutely is including the Apple Vision. It’s the real world, in real time, with all the inputs and processing capability required to interact with it.
All your other complaints have nothing whatsoever to do with your silly definition of AR made for the sole purpose of excluding the most exciting piece of tech in the space ever. Weight and battery capacity are also completely unrelated to any possible valid definition of what AR is.
They didn’t do a clear coat like everything else ever made lol.
deleted by creator
Apple hasn’t called it AR.
But it absolutely is AR. If you can see the real world in real time, with additional information on top of it, that’s AR. Your requirement that it not be on a screen is completely arbitrary and has no basis behind it whatsoever.
For first party stuff, Nintendo launches finished games (though Sony does too).
For third party, cartridges are expensive enough that it’s not uncommon at all for companies to straight up make a bunch of content download only. A lot of “multiple game” collections only put some of the games on the cartridge (not counting the ones that tie some to keys).
I don‘t see a reason why these cardridges wouldn‘t work in 20 years anymore.
Because, just like discs, they’re a crappy pre-launch build that relies on day one patches or additional content to actually work correctly.
I would be shocked if the newer versions don’t have a software hack way before that.
The fact that the first version was easy to hack made later versions lower priority, but at some point for the sake of preservation or to have the OLED, the new ones will catch up.
To turn every comment, no matter how on topic, into obnoxious spam.
I really want absolutely no part of people who don’t understand code using LLMs to submit things they don’t understand. That’s a disaster waiting to happen at best.
If you don’t understand every line you’re submitting completely, you should not be submitting code. It absolutely does need to be restricted to people who know what they’re doing.
Eh, it is what it is. I could sideload if I really wanted to.
After more effort than it should have taken (for some reason my PIA app or Android was bouncing local connections even with the settings to allow it enabled) ebooks do work. Probably not well enough for me to actually use it, though. It only turns pages with swipes and doesn’t really give any ways to do formatting. I’m surprised I’ve seen it suggested by people for ebooks with how limited it is. (I fully understand that it’s not the priority development-wise).
But at least I finally set up docker, which I’ve meant to do forever.
It’s a US site and a US court.
US law is the only thing relevant to the case being discussed.
I’m not crazy into stats (I don’t track books when I re-read them, though goodreads supports that), but audible’s “you read 30k minutes last year” was definitely kind of cool. (The fact that it took me a full 30 minutes to add the new books I’ve read across 5 apps since last time I bothered putting stuff on goodreads? Not so much.)
My problem is I have a whole stack of different apps to fill out my listening, so Audible’s numbers are 90% the 1 author I actually bought from them outright, then there’s two different library apps, and a subscription to Scribd Everand for a bunch of my reading, plus actual files in a different app, so none of it really means anything, and not everyone provides it so I can’t even compare.
It’s too bad the iOS app is stuck behind test flight, but it looks like it supports ebooks, too, so I think I might try it on my Android readers and see how it manages for those. I desperately need a better system for those than “just go find the file and use boox drop when I feel like it”.
Imagine thinking you should be able to use the platform that makes “open source” their whole marketing pitch while locking you into their platform that they have paywalls on, then try to enforce restrictions on how modifications to their “open source” project are allowed to work, for free.
None of this is “hacking”
It’s really not.
In poor countries sure, but not the US or Europe. You will get sued and you will pay if you do that at any scale.