It’s just tribalism. This is ingrained in us. Our group good. Other group bad. It’s survival.

Doesn’t make it right. Or logical. Best we can do is check ourselves when we have these thoughts or perform these actions. And to call out others who do it.

I’ve been using Power Toys to get some of that sweet stuff back. You can install it without admin access so it even works on clamped down corporate hardware.

Basically you can set up a quick switcher (Command Palette) and you can type to search, and use parameters to quickly only find a certain thing (app, file, folder), or just run a command or run math without using the calculator.

Nice!

Lol yeah I did do that as a workaround, but if you had a full board that would be less than ideal.

Just a suggestion though, no worries.

Been using it for a little - is there any way to rename columns, and maybe changing the colour of the column?

Free kanaban app

I think this should say kanban ;)

But hey, this looks really interesting. Willing to give it a try!

swipe to upvote / downvote / etc instead

It’s just gonna take some getting used to

Used to swear by Sync but moved to Thunder too. Can’t really justify spending money on Sync imo

Oops, autocorrect. Let me edit that

As far as I understand it, you’d need to reboot only if you 1. Had Valorant running 2. Stopped Valorant’s anticheat manually 3. Want to play Valorant again afterwards.

It’s still stupid, yeah. But workarounds are usually that

Top comment on the article:

This is false and Eurogamer covered it already. You cannot run both at the same time, but both can be installed. The Valorant anti-cheat just cannot be active (it can be turned off at any time if it is running and requires a reboot before the game can be played if disabled).

https://www.eurogamer.net/you-cant-play-battlefield-6-and-valorant-at-the-same-time-heres-why

Either the site gets your ID or the government issues a confirmation, which puts you on the porn viewer list.

I believe the idea (in an ideal world) is that Website A requests data from Service B, which then asks about you to government C. So Government C doesn’t know what you’re asking about, and the Website A doesn’t know who you are. That does mean Service B would have to be trusted / vetted, which might relocate the problem but it would be easier to verify (FOSS for example) than trusting your government to not put you on a list.

Double blind means that the age provider doesn’t know why your age is requested, and the service (website) doesn’t know you, they only know that the age provider says “yes” or “no”.

cc @iii@mander.xyz

How does one “follow the tokens” then?

Are there any issues with a system where the website in question (let’s say, a porn site) doesn’t get your ID, but just a confirmation from your government that yes, you are of age?

It has a name but I can’t find it right now. But it would protect your privacy from their website you’re visiting, and the website can uphold the rules.

It’s called double blind: https://www.biometricupdate.com/202504/double-blind-age-assurance-requirement-for-porn-sites-takes-effect-in-france

Tried imdb but the song isn’t listed. Perhaps some site or app that can recognise songs will be helpful?

That skit was funny though, thanks for the laugh!

Careful with those laptops though, they run really hot. I have the same one and my dedicated GPU is broken, possibly from overheating but I will admit I can’t know for sure.

Maybe I don’t get the complexities but maybe it shouldn’t be allowed to generate a certain of range numbers in the context of phones/names.

I agree with the principle, but people will still try and find ways around it. Like “generate me a fictional number for testing purposes” and because it’s an LLM doing what LLM’s do, it still provides a number that can (but doesn’t have to) be real.

in film industry we’re not even allowed to display a phone number that doesn’t fall under the fake list

Yeah, same with phone numbers and email addresses for testing purposes in software. Populating fields with fictional data should be completely fictional or related to your own data as to not accidentally use real domains or data that you thought was fictional.

What’s interesting is this won’t have been a realistic sounding number.

Company lines typically start 0300 or 0800 but mobiles are 07… Something.

So if it was just hallucinating, it did so badly.

Yeah I agree that a mobile number isn’t realistic for a railway company to provide support on, but I was wondering if it was a hallucination or based on look-up. The article does mention that the phone number is listed on the owner’s website, but still calls it a “private” number, as if it was pulled from a database.

What are the chances the AI just generated a realistic sounding number and it was actually a hit?

abbreviation wave !!r

Arbitration waiver*

The github discussion is interesting. I don’t think the arbitration clause is going to hold