“Safe” being defined in a user-hostile manier, i.e. with unmodified Google components and not rooted.
“Google-controlled” would be a better word.
“Safe” being defined in a user-hostile manier, i.e. with unmodified Google components and not rooted.
“Google-controlled” would be a better word.
Such is the fate of hypercentralized spaces. The fediverse fixes this.
I don’t see how this is so difficult. Given the choice between a narcissistic billionaire or an independent, accountable government commission that’s bound by the rule of law, I’ll choose the latter every time.
I don’t have an opinion on the matter being discussed
You know it’s an option to just… keep scrolling right? This isn’t high school, you aren’t obliged to leave a comment.
With this approach you would lose the subvolume structure and deduplication if I’m not mistaken.
Obviously acquiring publicly available data is legal
Under the EU GDPR it is often not legal. Controllers need a legal basis, which only exists if there is an appropriate relationship between the controller and the data subject.
No, you got downvoted because you were insulting and incorrect.
The Google Play Store has long been the bastion for safe and worry-free app downloads
It’s nice that the article starts with this blatent lie, so that you know everything that follows is just regurgitating Google’s marketing.
Even ignoring that most of the apps in the play store are unreviewed proprietary spyware sending all their data back to Google, there have been many instances of obvious malware being distributed through the play store. It seems like they are trying to sweep that under the rug.
Do you have experience with Spanish employment law?
You can’t just compare the file sizes without looking at the quality. Each will have different quality loss depending on the exact encodings used.
A uno reverse card?
I don’t understand the question and I won’t respond to it.
Tbf I would also be afraid of dogs if they were twice my size.
Who are the two characters tied up in the fourth panel?
“Gen Z simply uses technology more than any other generation and is therefore more likely to be scammed via that technology.”
raid is essential anyway
Why? If there are offsite backups that can be restored in an acceptable time frame, what’s still the point of RAID?
It seems like this order is rather limited and the IA can continue almost all of their work.
If you turn the fan up high enough it will blow the heat from outside into the house. Trust me, I’m a scientists.
Applying AI-voodoo to a non-existing problem with unknown side effects? Sign me up!
This doesn’t advocate for any substantial improvement of data protections. It’s merely a convenience argument to legitimize banning Chinese cars for economic reasons. American car manufacturers will continue to harvest and sell all your data, just with less competition.
Of course, this isn’t a surprise coming from the CFR, the lobbying organization for US imperialism.