that’s why opposing Putin “defends” liberty
You lost me here. Could you explain?
I think you would be surprised how many people would not only understand but also engage in the same activity.
More of the childish insults that you were acting above and accusing me of poor reading comprehension after I pointed out your own issue with it.
Are you special? Because you seem to have missed that the original “they” and the “they” offered in Apollo’s anecdote were not the same or comparable. Apollo never engaged with sympathy. I asked a question that they didn’t answer. I asked it again politely and they started getting rude. I am not demanding an answer I’m pointing out that they just never actually answered.
I have not refused to engage in discussion. You gave an anecdote about yourself instead of answering my question about the percentage that mellow was talking about. I acknowledged your anecdote and asked my unanswered question again. You are avoiding the question because you know answering it will show that your initial quip was off. Mellow wasn’t saying that wanting those things was selfish. Don’t cry about insults. Every negative turn in this conversation has been initiated by you.
No, you wanted to be hostile from the start. And you still never actually answered the question. Dodging the point and the question is manipulation. Doing so repeatedly does seem dishonest.
Keep dodging the point you know I’ve made. I’ll want to hear your answer if you ever give an on topic honest one.
Or you could have answered the question I asked instead of offering an irrelevant personal anecdote.
I’m trying to get you to see that the nature of the reasons are not what the selfishness was in reference to but rather their scope of caring. A hard right republican woman can think that she deserves to have an abortion herself but if she doesn’t care if that extends to others then she is selfish. If the percentage that mellow was talking about are only liberal because the issues listed impact them then that does kinda seem selfish. It is not a commentary at all about the rightness or wrongness of those issues.
Of course, but are they only liberal because of the issues that directly impact them?
Are they only liberal because of the issues that directly impact them?
Was it really necessary to include perky nipples and a camel-toe on Amy?
Really wish these people would jerk off first and then make their fan art.
I like how as you descend into evil and madness you increasingly discard the “don’t draw attention to yourself” part and with chaotic evil the wealth generation aspect is pretty much forgotten. The progression feels right.
Not the richest fastest but probably nice and discreet: electronics repair shop using mending.
I’m not sure if I would say he’s a bad person. Much more certain about saying that he is not a good person. I look forward to someone else stepping into the role of scientific ambassador to the common folk.
I used to be a fan of Neil until I saw how he conducts himself in person. He is not only arrogant but also needlessly cruel. I watched him make a girl break down and cry in front of an auditorium full of hundreds of people by ridiculing her and the question she asked during the q and a part of his visit. It was intentional and unnecessary. And he even made condescending remarks referring back to her after later questions so it wasn’t like he was accidentally too heavy handed with his initial dismissal of her.
which almost always means its illegal since ripping your own discs is mostly piracy too, legally speaking
Is this actually the case?
That would make sense. I ended up kind of ignoring astarion in my first play through so I wouldn’t have seen that ability if it is from him.
That doesn’t matter. The hypothetical presented by OP has already established the assumption that a robot can suffer.