It’s not luck it’s pretty well defined what works
- 0 Posts
- 35 Comments
Not really it is full featured under X under Wayland some of the features are replaced by your desktops features exclusively
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Privacy@lemmy.ml•This is getting laughably ridiculousEnglish10·1 month agoNo you would not because you don’t need to go to the website to download software to use Nvidia on Linux. Also the Nvidia driver on Linux is literally just a driver and settings package it has no online features
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Privacy@lemmy.ml•This is getting laughably ridiculousEnglish57·1 month agoYou can on Linux just saying
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•The driver for my mouse occupies over 1 gbEnglish2·3 months agoI have flatpaks installed but not org.gnome.* note not first gtk app the first that require gnome runtimes. Then once you have a bunch of apps you’ll end up with different versions needing different runtimes which will need constant updates of the same 1G. Given modern connectivity and storage it isn’t that burdensome in truth but neither is the Windows example.
It’s just humorous to crow over one and ignore the other.
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•The driver for my mouse occupies over 1 gbEnglish12·3 months agoIts broken fix or toss this solution isn’t applicable directly. Also seems like it would be hard to intentionally double click and add latency to single clicks
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•The driver for my mouse occupies over 1 gbEnglish11·3 months agoThis is a physical defect. Macros make one key press effect one or more action button or key press. For instance if a common operation involves pressing a b and c in sequence you can make one button on your mouse actuate that sequence.
You can’t bind a macro to left click because then you can’t left click anymore. Even if you bound double clicking to single click (if this is even possible) it would mean every time it single click you would effect nothing which is equally if not more broken.
You need to either take your mouse apart and fix it or throw it in the trash.
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•The driver for my mouse occupies over 1 gbEnglish56·3 months agoand if you install it via fatpak its almost 1GB
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•*Permanently Deleted*English21·3 months agoNever heard of this happening to anyone whereas porch pirates are literally everywhere doesn’t seem reasonable
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•*Permanently Deleted*English31·3 months agoThey stole it explicitly because they thought they could get away with pretending someone else stole it from the door by photographing it by the door… Nobody can steal it from inside a locker. It follows that they wouldn’t have done it in that scenario. Also doordash basically hires everyone on planet earth. It hires some folks it doesn’t even know its hired because they are obviously working on someone else’s account.
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•Removal of Deepin Desktop from openSUSE due to Packaging Policy ViolationEnglish21·4 months agoIt needed those things brought in through the back door because the code was a steaming pile of shit security wise and would have been rejected at the front door.
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•That's all folks, Plex is starting to charge for sharingEnglish122·5 months agoLikewise nobody is owed good feelings by users
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•That's all folks, Plex is starting to charge for sharingEnglish114·5 months agoIf they can’t do anything better than jellyfin which is fully free open source I don’t see why they should expect money. If Photoshop were paid for gimp they certainly wouldn’t deserve anything.
I think the bad feelings are by virtue of taking away something that WAS free. This is just basic human psych people are loss averse.
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•Can we please, PLEASE for gods sake just all agree that arch is not and will never be a good beginner distro no matter how many times you fork it?English2·7 months agoEveryone has a right to go their own way. Everyone has a right to have an opinion on how you go your own way.
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•Can we please, PLEASE for gods sake just all agree that arch is not and will never be a good beginner distro no matter how many times you fork it?English6·7 months agoAnd no, it doesn’t run worse
Flatpaks that aren’t official products of the source project sometimes have interesting issues pertaining to their permissions, are harder to set as the handler for files, harder to enable usage of system tools, don’t follow system themes, are harder to start or use from the command line, and yes start slower than native apps.
I like the idea that even stable distros can have latest stuff easily or distros which don’t package a given project. I use a few myself. It is certainly annoying that it ends up teaching people about what dirs they need to share with flatseal, flatseal, desktop files, and the command line for something which is supposed to simplify things.
Kinda feels like less work to use rolling release with a more comprehensive set of packages.
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•Can we please, PLEASE for gods sake just all agree that arch is not and will never be a good beginner distro no matter how many times you fork it?English15·7 months agoThere’s a good reason why there is no GUI installer in arch (aside from being able to load it into ram).
This is the dumbest conceit of the arch community. I learned Linux using Fedora back when regular usage required more know how than installing arch does and it was enormously helpful to have something you could click and install and THEN learn in a functional environment. Also following the guide isn’t THAT hard its just a waste of effort for a million people to do so.
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Is there a "normie" or more mainstream instance for Lemmy?English184·8 months agoWhy not just join non-political communities and focus on the content that they enjoy. If people are nervous about meeting assholes on the internet perhaps they should stick to cable tv or netflix.
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy votes ARE public, should they be anonymous?English6·1 year agoThere are a lot of people not worth attending to. If you do spend your time listening to these folks you don’t hear new ideas you hear the same bad ones over and over. It would be lovely that having noticed that someone is a persistent holocaust denier he could be added to a list that would disappear not only their contributions but their votes as well for thousands of users.
michaelmrose@lemmy.worldto Fediverse@lemmy.world•Lemmy votes ARE public, should they be anonymous?English62·1 year agoIs it hard to imagine noticing that an account you generally trust has voted and matching their vote, even subconsciously?
Not only is it not hard to imagine its easy to imagine the benefits of using this information automatically. I could imagine a client side script which re-ordered content based on who I trusted who had up or down voted it.
So I have users A B C D E F who are known to me who have voted on a given post. D and E are idiots I disregard their votes. F literally hates everything I love so I count his votes inversely. A and B are fantastic I count them x10 I tend to agree with C so I count his x2.
Not only can I potentially re-score threads and comments based on whom I trust I can if I really trust someone’s opinion apply their weights as well, and the weights of the folks upstream.
This is quite frankly nonsense