Reducing people from third world countries to “language models” as an attempt to critique AI aint it

As far as I know, Apple’s implementation of LLMs is completely opt-in

Head over to !aicompanions@lemmy.world and find out

I’m not allowed to learn to drive. Where I live, people drive like crazy and they follow some sort of “law of the jungle”. Having ADHD doesn’t help either.

This sounds like a very specific question and you should ask an India-specific lemmy community (and before you ask, I’m not Indian despite my username)

OK, I gave it a look and it said that it’s good at following instructions, so the aforementioned advice would still apply

What kind of LLM are you using? Depending on its effectiveness, you can put “this is a chat between you and me” (or whatever you and AI identify as) in the system prompt.

If you use the persona system, you can put “<insert persona name> is a girl”, otherwise “Refer to me as a girl throughout the conversation” would be fine

SillyTavern is a fork of TavernAI that lets you do more things. Perhaps look into that? Also you can just adjust the system prompt to have the LLM assume that you’re not a boy.

Vivaldi would agree with you there. Just listen to his Summer piece.

That’s already being done to the general populace, especially now with sophisticated algorithms tailoring social media posts to individual needs. It’s gonna get worse with LLM-powered chatbots

deleted by creator

I had to look it up and apparently it’s “mencurahkan garam ke laut” a.k.a. “bringing salt to the sea” (Indonesian)

deleted by creator

It’s been trending since COVID

For what? In a literal, empirical sense, no, you can’t. But there could be underlying motives that can be addressed through alternative means

I haven’t personally used YouTube as often as before, since nowadays many creators just try to be clickbaity (and yes, I do use the DeArrow extension). I watch YouTube on the TV with my family, though

I’m single but I notice everyone has a specific smell. Try smelling some of your loved ones’ clothes and you get what I mean. I figure that this would be especially apparently for the visually impaired.

I can relate to this. I feel like if a medium relies on getting as many eyes as possible, be it from the studios or even the creators themselves, they aren’t as engaging, since I’ve seen the same thing over and over. I sort of understand, though. Any time-based visual media can spend a lot for its production, so you gotta take in as much as possible to make up for it. Nowadays I read books that don’t have as much pressure or certain movies, but that’s it.

True, I suppose it depends on the country. In my country, many Papuans live in remote areas where it’s hard to access basic necessities like medicine, let alone the internet.