And that’s why I’m saying social democracy is a realistic solution. The way the world works right now makes breaking this dependency something idealistic. So you can either fantasize with ideals all day long or you can get closer to your objective.
And that’s why I’m saying social democracy is a realistic solution. The way the world works right now makes breaking this dependency something idealistic. So you can either fantasize with ideals all day long or you can get closer to your objective.
And yet, I’m not going bankrupt after someone in my family used an ambulance.
Well, show me a single system (currently implemented, not ideal or imaginary) that isn’t exploiting goods and labor from the third world.
Exactly. They are twisting reality to justify their shirty actions.
Yes, that’s the spirit.
Yeha, that’s my point. They automatically put you in the far-right if you don’t agree with a principle of communism.
As others have pointed out in other posts, they are using Spez as an escape-goat. It makes total sense. Once they get rid of Spez, their policies will remain and the hate will no longer have a tangible target.
The US is the largest global economy. How is it that free healthcare is a thing even in developing countries?
A few days ago my grandfather used an ambulance and the total cost was $0. I live in a developing country.
I see a fellow social democrat and I upvote.
People here think that if you agree with private property and private incentive then you suck billionaires d*cks.
Man, there is a whole spectrum that is much more realistic than pure communism or socialism.
So you never intended to buy the product but you intended to use it?
Do you understand they are charging you for the usage, not for your intentions or moral views?
Push bracelets on you? Who is forcing you to use their software? Please let me know, we can call the police man, that’s fucked up.
You’re taking away the profit they deserve for the work and effort it took them to create the information.
When they think it is morally correct, yeha. When they think piracy is morally correct and ethical, they are basically disregarding private property and private incentive. They think it is their right to have free access to information that others worked to create.
I wouldn’t have a problem if they accepted they are basically stealing, at least I’d respect that, but they won’t. They think piracy is freeing society from capitalism. If you don’t believe me, keep reading the posts in this community.
All Nolan movies, except Tenet.
You could dual boot and use Windows for gaming.
Are upvotes for agreement ok though? Or should upvotes be reserved for quality content?
So they are against it by using it? What?
I also think these corporations are evil, but complaining about everything they do just because it is an inconvenience for them? They should complain and act on the shit that matters.
I rode my bike exclusively on the hardest hills known in my city. Like hills that took 2h and had inclinations that would make it extremely hard to start if you stopped pedaling.
Fast forward 6 months. I have chicken legs.
Then why aren’t they using these alternatives? Why does every company and place need to follow their ideals?
This is exactly what I was going to say. Copying and pasting passwords is definetely a no-no for me.