People being excited about getting spam from a scammer.

What a time to be alive…

The issue seems a bit misrepresented by the dev.

The mentioned section of the privacy policy is true only for the logged in users that have agreed to voluntarily share their data.

Without logging in they don’t even store a single cookie on my device.

I’d like that to be “new”, but… It’s not exactly the first time this exact thing happened in tech.

That website actually promotes Firefox, you know. Not sure it fits this thread.

Thank you for being one person in this thread that actually read and understood my comment.

A bunch of comments repeating “Signal is the most secure because I said so” was not helpful.

Sure, buddy.

Maybe you should read the comments you’re replying to first.
If you can’t do that much then maybe you just shouldn’t comment at all.

I’ll simplify it for you:

1. Did I suggest Signal is not secure? No.
2. Did the OP make a claim Signal is somehow the most secure chat on the planet based on non existing sources pulled out of his ass? Yes.

Discussion quality on Lemmy starts looking like Reddit now.
Almost feels like home…

OK, and how is that different from the other chats?

You do know that at least Signal and Matrix use pretty much the same crypto, right?

And Matrix can be self-hosted, so I don’t need to worry about what they can see anyway.
On this point alone Matrix appears more secure than Signal…

And Threema is Switzerland-based, so by default it’s more trustful than a USA-based company.

Signal is the most secure

[citation needed]

Yes.

It also gets some free publicity by claiming to be federated/decentralized without the user having to make any actual choices in regards to a server (because there isn’t really any choice).

It seems pretty easy to break, unfortunately.

Or it just time outs on longer articles.

It’d be funny if the other companies caught in the crossfire now sued those LaLiga assholes for blocking their services.

I don’t think being open matters here, it’s the part where it’s developed by big bad China.

All of these threats apply to other LLMs as well.

I was in a similar situation, I just told them I’m cancelling the account when they added the extra charge for extra users, and they’re free to make their own account if they want.

There was a bit of complaining, but it turns out no one missed Netflix enough to come back.

Last I checked 7900 GRE looked good for perf/price ratio.

But I’d wait for AMD to finally announce details and pricing for new gen, I think it’s a bad moment to buy a new GPU until all Nvidia and AMD announcements are done.

Or you could consider alternatives, since Nvidia abusing their market position and customers not caring is exactly why the prices keep going up.

Yeah, I tried it for a bit 1 or 2 years ago and didn’t see much difference.

Only cool thing was the automatic summaries with sources, but the I found out LLM summaries are like everything else “AI” - unreliable, at best, so…

And besides… aren’t AI features getting pushed in Kagi heavily?

Weird idea to use it as an argument against Google and DDG, but conveniently ignore it for Kagi.

I mean… when did it stop being huge?

It’s just back to business as usual.

Yes, and another big difference is that Bottles refuses to provide any kind of help to package maintainers.
According to maintainers’ comments on the Github project, they have to figure out how to build it by trial and error.

I was actually really surprised that there’s isn’t any kind of build documentation.
It’s pretty unusual.

I don’t think it’s understandable in this case, no.

The entire project depends on Wine, imagine if Wine devs restricted Bottles in what way they are allowed to use it just because Wine project doesn’t want to deal with bugs potentially introduced by the Bottles dev.

But they won’t, because of the license.
And neither can the Bottles devs.

If they want to have total control over their source code, fine, but then they cannot claim to be open-source and release it under GPL.