There are some red flags for me:
- first I doubt anyone compiled the code themselves and use what’s in the app store
- the insistence to be tied to the phone number
- refusing to work if you don’t update (in the app store)
There are some red flags for me:
Did you compile and use that on your phone or are you using the app in the app store?
Do we know how it does that. Signal is praised for security, but a lot of things it does feel iffy and don’t make me trust it.
To add to that. Russian government was demanding to be able to access messages or will ban Telegram in the country.
Did not hear anything beyond that, but Telegram continues to operate there.
If I had this requirement I would just generate a file of specific size, place it on one server and on the other I would have a shell script running via cron and measure the time it took to download the file.
It seems like a relatively simple problem.
BTW are you sure you want to test download speed and not latency? I think some routers might have the later built in.
So first of all, your mom is reluctant in letting others know where she lives. It has nothing to do with rights but with decency and respecting her wishes.
As when it comes to your rights, actually you have very little as an adult. Technically now your mom could say that you have to move out and if she did that you would be on your own even if that would mean being homeless.
Since you are so eager to go on a date, asking about your rights wrt your mom I think you likely don’t understand why your mom is concerned and sound like an easy prey to someone that can just use you and you will deeply regret shortly after.
Why not meet someone in normal circumstances (like school, work etc) instead dating strangers?
Remember that having additional privileges is a small part of being adult, much bigger are responsibilities that you get and consequences of bad decisions that you make.
Don’t start your adult life with something you might regret.
It’s funny that kids wish they were adults while adults wish they were kids again.
I guess no one offered anything for .internal
I didn’t think about it, though if that makes it harder to track it (can’t they just check the user agent?) could that actually be good, as the sites will never know exactly how many users they will lose, so might be more hesitant to pull the trigger?
Absolutely. If you think you can switch when chrome will be completely hostile it will be too late.
The reason they are trying those things in chrome is because the market share of Firefox is currently low. They are counting that you won’t have the option to run Firefox anymore, because sites will stop supporting it. Don’t let that happen.
We saw other similar news from China which turned out to be a bunk. I wouldn’t hold my breath. I would love to be wrong though.
That’s how I understand Mastodon’s meant to work. You have your instance like you do a mail server, then you have full control over it.
I also like this one:
“Just the other day a defeated-looking man came up to me and said, ‘Mr. President, I have crushing debt, and I’m completely wiped out,’” Biden said at a fundraiser. “And I had to look at him and say, ‘Donald, I’m sorry. I can’t help you.’”
His own National Security Advisor speaks against him. That should normally raise a lot of red flags.
You’re misunderstanding him, he was talking about Hunter Biden /s
A spine would make him endorse Biden, this is more of “he actually tried to murder me, I won’t endorse anyone then”.
Yeah, you guys took the whole J6 out of context! /s
They rarely make sense though. McConnell for example endorsed him.
Oh, I first heard about them from Jon Stewart who was making fun of Dr Phil about it. I was thinking that those Chinese soldiers were just his personal fantasy, and looks like that’s its own conspiracy.
We have regular citizen Jack Teixeira getting 16 years and many say he got off easy.
Three streaming (like pointed in the other comment) was my initial reaction too, but indeed at the time https for streaming would be very rare.
Another possibility is to realize that openssl isn’t just for communication, but also has implementation of cryptographic algorithms.
Perhaps openssl was used for validation of licensing key? For example they could sign the license with their private key and WinAmp could verify it’s authenticity with its public key.