Yep, it and Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom! The first PG-13 movie was Red Dawn, which would probably be R today.

Never seen or read it, but am in the middle of Blood Meridian from the same author… Yeah, I get it.

If you know about how Pennywise works, this is really funny.

As someone who’s never seen it, I feel like I need to watch it now.

MANKIND IS DEAD. BLOOD IS FUEL. HELL IS FULL.

1950s-1960s pulp Japanese sci-fi show in black and white where the villains are dressed in silly-looking outfits with antennae and a big “Z” in the centre. The first episode’s plot was about a scientist’s daughter being kidnapped.

I might be wrong but I’m pretty sure Anarchy is a book built off of v5.

I felt like Anarchy was a weird system that was harmed by its nature as an extension of 5e, though I get its appeal. I personally prefer the classic FASA editions.

fucking clanker

Oh, hey, I love your comics! I wonder which edition it was: 1e, Burned Over, or 2e?

we get a little silly

Wait, wasn’t Burned Over a toned down version of 1e, with 2e being later?

I heard DW is getting a second edition. Now that I think about it, I don’t think post-apocalyptic TTRPGs are very popular in general.

I did actually work on a PbtA magical girl game at one point (with a Cthulhu Mythos setting, but still), though I later ended up scrapping it.

… I mean, that is one of the themes of VtM.

Try Cities Without Number! It’s also an OSR game, and is more well-suited for the Sixth World setting.

GbM is Forged in the Dark, but I get your point.

I’m pretty sure Critical Role has also done some Monsterhearts stuff, which is also indie. I don’t personally like that game for a myriad of reasons, but I do believe Mercer ran it one or two times.

I’ve literally never heard anyone blindly hate D&D on Tumblr. There are a lot of complaints, for sure, but the biggest blogs there post about how D&D is fundamentally a game about dungeons and not meant for other things, and most of them celebrate the system when used right.

Not ending well in either interpretation of that sentence.