Beemo Dinosaurierfuß

  • 0 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle

  • You comment and comment and explain and explain shit that everyone already knows.

    It is like you just recently learned what marketing is and now you feel like you know some big secret.

    Just to make it short.
    Every product in the world is marketed in a way to motivate consumers to buy.
    That is not inherently immoral.

    You said every successful game monetizes by maximizing addiction and frustration.

    I have proven you wrong by naming games that just DO NOT MAXIMIZE FRUSTRATION.

    Yeah off course even those games dangle stuff in front of you that you are supposed to buy.
    That’s the whole business model of f2p games.

    But there are different ways to get to the players money.

    There are those that indeed trigger responses to frustration.
    This is absolutely prevalent in mobile games or even those million deckbuilder games.

    But there just are also games that use other ways to make players buy mtx.
    Again, you can play PoE, LoL, CS and many other games for literal thousands of hours without ever getting coaxed into frustrating barriers like a Diablo Immortals would do to players.

    You said there aren’t. So you were wrong.

    So have fun running around with a goalpost in your hand, I am done.


  • right?

    No, still wrong.

    Obviously it is something that is not given to you for free.
    It is a product and the developers/publishers are doing business after all.

    And yes Sherlock, it is qol functionality that people playing the endgame might want and that is not included in the free version of the game.
    But every functionality that any player ever needs is available for far less than what any other AAA title costs up front.

    PoE is mainly financed by purely cosmetic supporter packs and whales.
    Is that much more ethical than what you described? Maybe not.

    But it sure as hell is not banking on frustrating the average user and thus a completely different form of monetization than the one that you just doubled down on insisting is the only one there is.
    So again as I said, you are just plain wrong.

    Oh and in CS I don’t think you can buy any functionality at all.
    Only cosmetics, that don’t do anything for you in the game.














  • I know that you have put more thought into this topic than I did and you just might be right.

    But dude that wallmart analogy misses the point by a mile.
    Wallmart kills the small stores by simply undercutting them, this has nothing to do with what meta might do.

    And you didn’t really argue my point that people like you and I could and probably would consume meta content if it was federated.
    But why would anyone that is part of the fediverse right now jump ship if meta came and went away again?

    I damn sure will never create another meta account or use any meta app. Would you?



  • We come from such similar mental places but still I have to disagree hard.

    the government simply had no other choice

    There is always a choice.

    A rather obvious one here would have been to have the law be formulated against inciting hate and/or violence in general.
    It is completely unnecessary to have this law revolve around religious texts just because the concrete reason happens to be connected to religious texts.

    Atheists who spread hate against religious communities are no better than religious fundamentalists spreading hate against Atheists.

    Like you said yourself, noone is burning books in the name of Atheism.

    I have not yet seen a single argument that could convince me that religious texts are any more worthy of legal protection than other pieces of culture that specific subgroups of society hold dear to their hearts.
    How is burning a rainbow flag or even a shirt of a rivaling football club less inciting hatred than burning a Quran?