Seconded, I first heard about this game from his channel.
Seconded, I first heard about this game from his channel.
That was good, thanks. Dude was like, “Why did you make me read your comment!?” Lol
It’s important to challenge assumptions and to do studies with “obvious” results, because we’ve been surprised so many times before.
Like putting speakers in monitors.
Duuuude, I hate that shit. If I need you, don’t worry, I know how to find you. I wasn’t just sitting here hoping somebody would offer to cut my grass, I was fucking sleeping!
I’ve always wondered about the legality of no solicitation signs.
5 AM is too early! Why did they need to knock on your door?
Definitely a skewed signal to noise ratio, which at this point feels intentional. Politics felt far more boring in the before-fore, but I think most of that was me not paying close enough attention.
I had a casual conversation with ChatGPT a while back about how this level of political division is unprecedented in the country (I guess I conveniently forgot about the civil war during this), and the response was basically “Everybody says that in every era,” so I wonder if I just have too narrow a focus. I should look into that…
“My” alternative is to not treat every human interaction as transactional maneuvering to curry favor. It’s an incredibly strange commodification of immaterial concepts that rejects or ignores the complexity and nuance of human emotions and motivations. It’s simply an inadequate theory.
That’s an unnervingly cold, reductionist, cynical take.
I was so apathetic in my early voting years, so I guess I’m doing my weird political thing in mid-life.
But as you just demonstrated, the generalized term should be used when specifics aren’t available.
Sounds like fun! I would reward the engagement with the stones they want. There’s room for all sorts of ways for it to work really well or really poorly. If they’re consistently using it to circumvent your story beats, maybe some interesting complications or particular defenses might be in order.