FlumPHP@programming.dev to Dungeons and Dragons@lemmy.world · edit-210 months agoDungeons & Dragons Publisher Denies Selling Game To Chinese Firm: Here’s What To Know [was: Hasbro Seeks to Sell IP “DND” and Has Had Preliminary Contact with Tencent]pandaily.comexternal-linkmessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up1194arrow-down110
arrow-up1184arrow-down1external-linkDungeons & Dragons Publisher Denies Selling Game To Chinese Firm: Here’s What To Know [was: Hasbro Seeks to Sell IP “DND” and Has Had Preliminary Contact with Tencent]pandaily.comFlumPHP@programming.dev to Dungeons and Dragons@lemmy.world · edit-210 months agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-squareMoobythegoldensock@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-210 months agoThat’s essentially what the ORC License does. Paizo wrote it, but then gave it to a law firm that represents several developers so no one RPG owns it.
minus-squareLibertyLizard@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoIsn’t that more of a license under which games can be developed than a game unto itself? Or did I misunderstand? Also, I want it to be managed by the community, not some law firm.
minus-squareMoobythegoldensock@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoYes, it’s a license. But nothing is to stop you for making your own free community-driven game under that license.
That’s essentially what the ORC License does. Paizo wrote it, but then gave it to a law firm that represents several developers so no one RPG owns it.
Isn’t that more of a license under which games can be developed than a game unto itself? Or did I misunderstand? Also, I want it to be managed by the community, not some law firm.
Yes, it’s a license. But nothing is to stop you for making your own free community-driven game under that license.