This BTW is how you involve in the story the reality of what the voters think, which is an important portion of election coverage, while still upholding your basic journalistic responsibility to communicate to people what’s actually going on.
This BTW is how you involve in the story the reality of what the voters think, which is an important portion of election coverage, while still upholding your basic journalistic responsibility to communicate to people what’s actually going on.
all I’m doing is correcting the record
There’s no record to correct. Everyone is well aware of the anti-voting campaign on lemmy, it’s pretty well documented, and there’s entire posts dedicated to the topic. So I’ve nothing to prove to you about it.
It’s plain as day to see, and my refusal to entertain your nonsense is not evidence to the contrary.
Now go away.
I did a search and couldn’t find any evidence of it except people claiming it exists, or refuting that claim.
Sorry you’re having such bad luck. I guess you’ll just have to disagree and just move on.
Good luck.
i linked the search, but you seem to want to ignore it. anyone reading this can see that.
Don’t really care. What I say is true. There are tons of anti-Biden trolls in lemmy. That you seem to be so adamantly denying it says an awful lot.
>There are tons of anti-Biden trolls
being anti-biden doesn’t make someone a troll, and it doesn’t mean they’re saying not to vote.
Anti-vote/biden… it’s the same here you’re it going to find many trump supporters in lemmy.
>Anti-vote/biden… it’s the same
this is misinformation
>What I say is true.
if it were true, you could provide evidence.
You see, my not producing evidence because of simply being asked for it- does not make what I say untrue. You’d be well served to learn how this works because the real world doesn’t follow the edge-lord internet rules that state “if you don’t provide the evidence I’m entitled to, it means you’re wrong!”
I just don’t entertain bad-faith requests. Nothing more or less.
I’ve told you that I’m not answering you, what part of that are you aging trouble with?
>I’ve told you that I’m not answering you,
feel free to find the interogative i posed.
>You’d be well served to learn how this works because the real world
don’t be condescending
>You see, my not producing evidence because of simply being asked for it- does not make what I say untrue.
i know that. in fact, i went and provided all the evidence i could about it, which is that it hasn’t happened in at least three days, but it’s my guess that it’s made up entirely.
i never asked you to provide any evidence
>“if you don’t provide the evidence I’m entitled to, it means you’re wrong!”
this is a strawman and deeply dishonest. i provided a reasonable method for establishing the veracity of your claim and i was unable to substantiate it.