And why do you use them?

    • Lantern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Was going to say this. Pycharm is probably the only paid software I use. With that being said, students don’t need to pay for it, so I don’t have to worry about that.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Half-life: Alyx, Baldur’s Gate 3, Elden Ring, … you get the idea. It’s not so much those apps per se, and I’d prefer them to be FLOSS too, rather it’s the amazing content and in such rare cases, I’m happy to financially support the creators.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What aren’t you happy to financially support creators of open source software you like?

  • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    DaVinci Resolve is THE video editor on Linux. Unfortunately the libre apps for it don’t get even close, to the point that even with all the limitations in the free and paid versions, it still is the best option.

    Also shout out to Bitwig Studio, although I don’t use it.

  • Julian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reaper. Great usability and decent Linux support out of the box (looking at you, davinci resolve). Generous free trial and a cheap one-time payment for a license. LMMS has served me well and is fine for basic stuff, but reaper is a whole other level, both in features and usability. I’ve heard good things about ardour too but have yet to give it a try.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would never willingly use proprietary software. I don’t mind paying if I also have access to source code that is licensed foss.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wish that was possible, but it’s not feasible to get a lot done on a 15 year old ThinkPad or whatever, that doesn’t have any proprietary firmware.

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I won’t say it’s “best”, as I just want to run a game without friendlists and other bloat, so I really hate the fact Steam is nessesary for so many games.

      But I would call it “essentiall”.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Valve has put a lot of work into helping WINE & Linux. Even if it was a selfish play to break free from Microsoft & other app stores to lock those into their marketplace fee, I can’t help but be grateful for the better ecosystem & uptick in users. Since they are privately held too, they aren’t in the same business of chasing quartely profits or making the experience worse & worse by selling your data & slapping ads everywhere.

    • yala@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yup, as time went on, I simply felt less need to have proprietary software on my system. Steam remains as an exception; simply by virtue of having no F(L)OSS alternative (AFAIK).

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Steam itself isn’t that special and things like Heroic exist but where Steam wins is the ecosystem. Also Valve sponsor developments of Linux desktop technologies, so even if Steam itself is proprietary, some of the money ends up advancing open source.