• Liontigerwings@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the main issue is the growth isn’t linear. It’s sporadic. Usually a big bump after every Reddit fuck up. Lots of bumps lately. Another one coming on the 30th.

    • atocci@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you think there are a lot of people on reddit who are still waiting for the 30th to make their lemmy/kbin account? I was assuming that most who were going to come over here from this blowup had moved already.

      • tangentism@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think its a case that those who moved recently (my account here is recent but Ive been on Lemmy.ml for 2 years), had seen the writing on the wall.

        When the effects start to kick in, there will be another few large influxes then when the majority left on Reddit wonder why the site went to shit overnight and where everyone else went, they will leave too.

        It will be very similar to what happened with Digg all those years ago.

      • Liontigerwings@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure. But I am still using Apollo and I don’t plan on downloading the official app when it dies so at the very least, I will go from 70/30 fediverse to almost 100 percent fediverse.

      • Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use Sync and saw someone suggest to the developer (who is adapting the app to Lemmy) that when the app stops working, it leaves a message indicating that Lemmy is a possible alternative. Not to say that suggestion will be taken, but I think it’s entirely possible that a decent chunk of basically uninformed users will find their favorite app inoperable and find themselves, directly or indirectly, referred to Lemmy.

  • raydenuni@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would be possible to run your own instance from within the app you use to browse? In other words, is there a reason for a personal Lemmy instance, with only me as a user and no communities, to run even when I’m not using it to interact with other communities?

    • Manticore@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Curated communities would likely choose to defederate from instances like that since they have no barrier for entry, and may be bots, spam, or bad actors.

      If you’re joining an established instance (or work with people to create a new one), then you’ll at least get a local community, which will both give a instance content if defederated, and legitimise it so it’s less likely to be.

  • Demigodrick@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like i go around in circles saying this - there are literally hundreds of servers. If servers had caps, i.e. user caps and community caps, then people would be forced to spread out, rather than relying on two or three big servers. Otherwise we just have a central server, which is Reddit with extra steps.

    • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah. Personally, I also think the join-lemmy.org page should just be a randomised list of instances, not “recommended” and “popular”. It’ll help strengthen the decentralisation and make sure that instances are able to cope with a lot of new users coming to Lemmy easier.

      • heartlessevil@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not all instances are equivalent, some of them have very different politics and moderation policies.

        • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Good point. I think something like a short questionnaire asking what the user is interested in and how they align, stuff like that, then showing a randomised list of instances that match that would be a better idea, then.

          Either way, I still think the current way of listing the instances needs to change.

  • bumbly@readit.buzz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They desperately need to support horizontal scaling. I’m sure there are enough nerds that could help them out there.

    • Die4Ever@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But we already have horizontal scaling in the form of separate instances. We just need to do a better job staying spread out. Making individual instances bigger is not a good thing, it makes everything more centralized.

      • ccunix@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hear what you’re saying, but horizontal scaling also gives you improved reliability too, which is good for individual instances.

        I for one would happily horizontally scale an instance I was running (which I am not for now) on my K8s lab. Why? Because I can and because I like it!

          • Brkdncr@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d hate for this to become an echo chamber of people that understand federated services. That excludes a lot of people that have no interest in it that have valuable input.