• FlumPHP@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 年前

    It’s also disingenuous because they already decline to host sex workers newsletters. So if the censorship angle was true, they’re already censoring.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Right, and if the profit motive angle were true, they’re already violating that by censoring the sex workers you just mentioned.

      So that eliminates profit as the reason for their actions here