Kentucky lawmakers gave final approval Thursday to a bill stripping the state’s Democratic governor of any role in picking someone to occupy a U.S. Senate seat if a vacancy occurred in the home state of 82-year-old Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.

The legislation calls for a special election to fill any Senate vacancy from the Bluegrass State. The special election winner would hold the seat for the remainder of the unexpired term.

  • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s what every generation says. Problem is that by the time a generation actually does step up to vote, they’ve become more conservative than when they were younger. Maybe it’ll be different this time.

    I’m looking forward to reading Fareed Zakaria’s new book. He argues that we are at the beginning of a new age of revolutions.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        My only complaint is that “liberal” in the US is absolutely not the antithesis of conservative.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It’s not a binary scale. There is no “opposite” of conservative. There are moderates to the left of conservatives, liberals to the left of moderates, progressives and social democrats to the left of liberals, and socialists to the left of progressives.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Yes, notice how many of those you yourself say are further left than liberal? That’s the point.

            • NateNate60@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I agree with you, but I think it’s understood what information the graph portrays and it isn’t productive to argue over the labelling semantics.

              • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                It’s not “arguing semantics” if the words mean very different things… The false notion that liberals are the opposite of conservatives NEEDS to die. Don’t keep it around over, “arguing semantics”. That’s insanely pathetic.

                • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Again, there is no term that would be a better label there because there is no opposite of “conservative” in the same way that there is no opposite of one-third. Any label you put there is equally bad

                  • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    You are being nonsensical. My point is there are terms further left than liberal. You agree with that, but then say they’re equidistant from conservative??

                    Choose one. Not both.

      • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Unfortunate that this graph starts in 1972, when the oldest baby boomers were already 27. If you compare that first section of the boomers’ line to the corresponding section of the millennials’ line, boomers were to the left of millennials around the same age.

        Now, I find it hard to imagine that millennials will have the “Reagan moment” that boomers had in 1980, but this data shouldn’t convince anyone that millennials are some shining ray of hope for the future. Today’s non-voting, politically apathetic millennials could easily be swayed to the right by the time they’re the age of today’s boomers. I see this sentiment repeated a lot lately, but it’s pure foolishness to think that conservatives will die with boomers.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It remains to be seen. The world generally trends leftward over time, but progress has to be fought for.

          Just two hundred years ago, republicanism in Europe was viewed as extreme as Americans view communism today. Six hundred years ago, capitalism was viewed as extreme.

      • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        That’s an interesting hypothesis. I think of it more in terms of human development over the lifespan rather than an artifact of survival bias. In my opinion, the relationship between age and conservatism is mainly because of three reasons:

        1. As you get older, you tend to accumulate more wealth, responsibility, children, etc. so you have more to lose than when you are younger, which means that you tend to value the system that protects what you have.

        2. As you get older, you get weaker and slower and lose the physical confidence and recklessness of youth. That feels vulnerable, so you tend to worry more about things like violent crime and disorder. You start to value stability and order more.

        3. When people are young, they tend to be more prone to simplistic and radical thinking, simply due to lack of life experience. This is both a strength and weakness. It makes youth passionate and energetic, but also more prone to believing that there are simple solutions to complex problems. I say that recognizing that nowadays most Trump supporters are older and are very much embracing Trump’s simplistic solutions, but I think we all recognize that something very radical is happening on the right wing.

        I note also that these are general trends across the lifespan, not deterministic or true for every individual.