• lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    do you have something that shows the opposite? i have no stake in this so it doesn’t really matter if you don’t, but it would be interesting to read a counter.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Besides what’s already been linked?

      Dr. Prewitt describes it this way: “It’s basically a way of changing your style, dress, or maybe even language or behavior, in order to match what you think would be appropriate or would make someone else feel comfortable.”

      https://health.clevelandclinic.org/code-switching

      Like, the prior sources are good, people are just taking parts clearly labeled “no citation” and chopping it up till it says what they want it to in a quote.

      And not at all relevant to the OP where they explicitly say the use of another language was due to forgetting it in a “common” language…

      I understand I probably sound frustrated, and I am.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        i don’t think anyone is disputing that meaning, and i understand why that would frustrate you because if the timeline is what you say the widening of the term would be ND erasure. but i also heard it in a linguistic context first, which is why i am not questioning the definition, only the time line.